RAM KARAN vs BHANWARI DEVI ETC. Advocate - ARJUNLAL VERMA — 18/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O07R0103. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 30th May 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJHG200003392023
Filing Number
18/2023
Filing Date
28-Aug-2018
Registration No
18/2023
Registration Date
28-Aug-2018
Court
ADJ RAWATSAR TALUKA HQ
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM KARAN
Adv. JAGDISH PRASHAD KADWASRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHANWARI DEVI ETC. Advocate - ARJUNLAL VERMA
-
2.DINESH KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: RAM KARAN v. BHANWARI DEVI (CIS 18/2023) The court dismissed the petitioner's partition and permanent injunction suit. The petitioner claimed he and his deceased brother jointly purchased a shop in Rawatsar using income from inherited agricultural land, with both names registered in municipal records. The court found the petitioner failed to prove joint ownership, noting absence of sale deed documentation, inconsistent evidence regarding purchase details, and suspicious timing of municipal registration (2018, not from purchase date). Evidence showed the shop was purchased by the brother alone and remained in his sole name in all official records until recently. Judgment (30.05.2026): Suit dismissed; petitioner has no partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Disposed
ADJ
-
26-May-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
19-May-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
12-May-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
05-May-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
28-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
07-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
17-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
17-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
27-Jan-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
13-Jan-2026
Final arguments
ADJ
-
23-Dec-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
09-Dec-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
18-Nov-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
23-Sep-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
26-Aug-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
05-Aug-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
29-Jul-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
17-Jul-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
07-May-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
08-Apr-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
05-Feb-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
07-Jan-2025
Final arguments
ADJ
-
23-Dec-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
18-Nov-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
21-Oct-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
09-Oct-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
08-Oct-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
07-Oct-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
24-Sep-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
10-Sep-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
07-Aug-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
05-Aug-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
24-Jul-2024
Final arguments
ADJ
-
22-Jul-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
09-Jul-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
08-Jul-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
06-May-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
20-Mar-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
19-Feb-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
18-Jan-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ
-
06-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Aug-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 18/2023
Case Summary: RAM KARAN v. BHANWARI DEVI (CIS 18/2023) The court dismissed the petitioner's partition and permanent injunction suit. The petitioner claimed he and his deceased brother jointly purchased a shop in Rawatsar using income from inherited agricultural land, with both names registered in municipal records. The court found the petitioner failed to prove joint ownership, noting absence of sale deed documentation, inconsistent evidence regarding purchase details, and suspicious timing of municipal registration (2018, not from purchase date). Evidence showed the shop was purchased by the brother alone and remained in his sole name in all official records until recently. Judgment (30.05.2026): Suit dismissed; petitioner has no partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts