ANIL KUMAR vs SEETA ETC — 11/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJHG200001132024

Filing Number

27/2024

Filing Date

14-May-2024

Registration No

11/2024

Registration Date

14-May-2024

Court

ADJ RAWATSAR TALUKA HQ

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL KUMAR

    Adv. RAJSHAKER SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SEETA ETC

  2. 2.BIRBAL RAM

  3. 3.RAJU RAM

  4. 4.SUB RAGISTRAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 11/2024 - Anil Kumar v. Seeta & Others The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of petitioner Anil Kumar concerning disputed agricultural land. An agreement dated 06-06-2023 established that respondents (Seeta and others) would sell the land to Kumar for ₹10,00,000, with ₹7,77,800 paid and the balance due on 05-04-2024. When respondents failed to complete the sale registration despite notice, Kumar sought court intervention. The court held that since the primary dispute point favored Kumar and respondents had failed to fulfill contractual obligations, respondents were restrained from transferring the disputed property to any third party, though they could use it lawfully otherwise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ

  10. 04-Nov-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ

  11. 06-Sep-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ

  12. 22-Jul-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ

  13. 20-May-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ

  14. 22-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  15. 05-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  16. 04-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  17. 21-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  18. 11-Dec-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  19. 22-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  20. 10-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  21. 05-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ

  22. 22-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 14-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 11/2024 - Anil Kumar v. Seeta & Others The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of petitioner Anil Kumar concerning disputed agricultural land. An agreement dated 06-06-2023 established that respondents (Seeta and others) would sell the land to Kumar for ₹10,00,000, with ₹7,77,800 paid and the balance due on 05-04-2024. When respondents failed to complete the sale registration despite notice, Kumar sought court intervention. The court held that since the primary dispute point favored Kumar and respondents had failed to fulfill contractual obligations, respondents were restrained from transferring the disputed property to any third party, though they could use it lawfully otherwise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case