Rajasthan Goverment vs Sunil Kumar urf pawan urf Khabri urf Sonu — 515/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305a,331-3. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th July 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJHG160012012025

Filing Number

1201/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

515/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

ACJM Tibbi HQ

Judge

1-Acjm

Decision Date

09-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

408

Police Station

Police Station Tibbi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305a,331-3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajasthan Goverment

    Adv. ADDITIONAL PROSECUTION OFFICER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Kumar urf pawan urf Khabri urf Sonu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jul-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 515/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Sunil Kumar (also known as Pawan, Khabri, Sonu), was acquitted under IPC Sections 331(3) and 305(A) due to lack of sufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's allegation of theft on September 17-19, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt through credible evidence. The CCTV footage and witness testimonies contained contradictions and inconsistencies. Crucially, no person directly witnessed the accused committing the alleged theft, no stolen items were recovered from him, and the FIR was delayed by 6-4 days. The court found the prosecution's case rested on suspicion rather than proof, warranting acquittal in the accused's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 25-Jun-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  5. 16-Jun-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  6. 02-Jun-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  7. 26-May-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  8. 15-May-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  9. 04-May-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  10. 22-Apr-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  11. 08-Apr-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  12. 25-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  13. 11-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  14. 25-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  15. 16-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  16. 02-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  17. 19-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 06-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 23-Dec-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  20. 17-Dec-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  21. 08-Dec-2025

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  22. 28-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 515/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 515/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Sunil Kumar (also known as Pawan, Khabri, Sonu), was acquitted under IPC Sections 331(3) and 305(A) due to lack of sufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's allegation of theft on September 17-19, 2025, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt through credible evidence. The CCTV footage and witness testimonies contained contradictions and inconsistencies. Crucially, no person directly witnessed the accused committing the alleged theft, no stolen items were recovered from him, and the FIR was delayed by 6-4 days. The court found the prosecution's case rested on suspicion rather than proof, warranting acquittal in the accused's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case