BHANWAR KHAN vs MOHAMMAD SADIK ETC. Advocate - SURENDRA MOHAN VERMA — 24/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39,R1,R2. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 08th May 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJHG130000532026
Filing Number
55/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
24/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
CJ JD RAWATSAR HQ
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge And Jm
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHANWAR KHAN
Adv. JITENDRA SINGH JODHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHAMMAD SADIK ETC. Advocate - SURENDRA MOHAN VERMA
-
2.Majid khan
Adv. KAMLESH PANDEY
-
3.Gunni Bano
-
4.Jubeda
-
5.Meena Tak
-
6.Sahida bano
-
7.Madina
-
8.Mumtaj bano
Adv. KAMLESH PANDEY
-
9.Kiran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Order
Case Summary: Bhanwar Khan v. Mohammad Sadik (24/2026) The Judicial Magistrate of Rawatsar granted a temporary injunction in favor of petitioner Bhanwar Khan against respondents Mohammad Sadik and Meed Khan. The court found that Bhanwar Khan established a prima facie case showing the disputed 500-bigha land parcel was purchased by his late father Inayat Ali through a registered deed of sale (Baiynama) dated 05.09.1963, and that the petitioner possesses 1/8 share in the property. The court determined that respondent Mohammad Sadik obtained an ex-parte decree dated 16.10.2025 based on an unregistered agreement (Ikaarnama), which cannot supersede the registered Baiynama. Balancing the convenience and irreparable harm, the court restrained respondents from evicting the petitioner or mortgaging the property pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And Jm
-
01-May-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
CIVIL Judge And Jm
-
23-Apr-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
CIVIL Judge And Jm
-
13-Apr-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
CIVIL Judge And Jm
-
09-Apr-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
CIVIL Judge And Jm
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
CIVIL Judge And Jm
-
01-Apr-2026
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
CIVIL Judge And Jm
-
24-Mar-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
CIVIL Judge And Jm
-
23-Mar-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
CIVIL Judge And Jm
-
17-Mar-2026
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
CIVIL Judge And Jm
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 24/2026
Case Summary: Bhanwar Khan v. Mohammad Sadik (24/2026) The Judicial Magistrate of Rawatsar granted a temporary injunction in favor of petitioner Bhanwar Khan against respondents Mohammad Sadik and Meed Khan. The court found that Bhanwar Khan established a prima facie case showing the disputed 500-bigha land parcel was purchased by his late father Inayat Ali through a registered deed of sale (Baiynama) dated 05.09.1963, and that the petitioner possesses 1/8 share in the property. The court determined that respondent Mohammad Sadik obtained an ex-parte decree dated 16.10.2025 based on an unregistered agreement (Ikaarnama), which cannot supersede the registered Baiynama. Balancing the convenience and irreparable harm, the court restrained respondents from evicting the petitioner or mortgaging the property pending final adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts