STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs RAMESH KUMAR Advocate - MOHAMMAD AARIF — 56/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366AI.P.C. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJHG070010202022
Filing Number
576/2022
Filing Date
26-Jul-2022
Registration No
56/2022
Registration Date
26-Jul-2022
Court
ADJ1 ADJ2 Nohar Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
Police Station Khuiyan
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Adv. ADDL.PP,
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMESH KUMAR Advocate - MOHAMMAD AARIF
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Judgement
Case Summary: 56/2022 Court Decision: The accused Ramesh Kumar was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 363 (kidnapping) and 366-A (abduction of a minor girl). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court identified critical contradictions in witness testimonies, particularly regarding the alleged victim's age. While the accused claimed the girl was an adult (approximately 23 years old at the time), the prosecution relied on school records showing a birth date of 04-09-2004 (making her a minor). However, the court found these age-related documents unreliable—the birth date was estimated based on age-group assumptions at school admission, with no authentic birth certificate produced. The court also noted that the alleged victim's own statements were inconsistent with her parents' claims, and no independent witness corroborated the abduction narrative. Consequently, the prosecution failed to establish the essential element of the victim being a minor at the time of the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
16-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
10-Apr-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
08-Apr-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
ADJ I
-
01-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
24-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
05-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
24-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
17-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
03-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
17-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
16-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
06-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
05-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
19-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
19-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
30-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
23-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
13-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
19-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
23-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
30-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
14-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
26-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
21-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
04-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
02-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
14-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
13-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
06-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
01-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
06-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
16-Jan-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
ADJ I
-
28-Nov-2023
Service of Non-bailable warrant
ADJ I
-
27-Oct-2023
Service of Non-bailable warrant
ADJ I
-
21-Sep-2023
Service of Non-bailable warrant
ADJ I
-
25-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
26-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
16-Jun-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
ADJ I
-
17-Mar-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
ADJ I
-
03-Jan-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
ADJ I
-
19-Nov-2022
Hearing arguments on Charge
ADJ I
-
23-Sep-2022
Hearing arguments on Charge
ADJ I
-
06-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2022
Case Summary: 56/2022 Court Decision: The accused Ramesh Kumar was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 363 (kidnapping) and 366-A (abduction of a minor girl). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court identified critical contradictions in witness testimonies, particularly regarding the alleged victim's age. While the accused claimed the girl was an adult (approximately 23 years old at the time), the prosecution relied on school records showing a birth date of 04-09-2004 (making her a minor). However, the court found these age-related documents unreliable—the birth date was estimated based on age-group assumptions at school admission, with no authentic birth certificate produced. The court also noted that the alleged victim's own statements were inconsistent with her parents' claims, and no independent witness corroborated the abduction narrative. Consequently, the prosecution failed to establish the essential element of the victim being a minor at the time of the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts