LAKSHMI DEVI vs HAR AAM KHAS ETC — 31/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed otherwise on 16th June 2026.
Civil Misc. Non connected (38) - CIVIL MISC (NC)
CNR: RJHG070001342026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
23-Jan-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Court
ADJ1 ADJ2 Nohar Taluka HQ
Judge
1-ADJ I
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed otherwise
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAKSHMI DEVI
Adv. RANJEET SINGH NAYAK
Respondent(s)
-
1.HAR AAM KHAS ETC
-
2.State Bank of India
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary of Case 31/2026 The court granted Lakshmi Devi's petition under Section 372 of the Succession Act, declaring her the legal heir of her deceased father Sukhdev and authorizing her to obtain succession certificates for bank deposits and FD holdings totaling approximately ₹10.79 lakhs. The court found that Lakshmi Devi was the sole legal heir, as her father left no will, her mother had divorced him and remarried, and the bank had wrongfully refused to recognize her heirship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
11-Jun-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
22-May-2026
Final arguments
ADJ I
-
27-Apr-2026
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
24-Mar-2026
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
27-Feb-2026
Written Statement
ADJ I
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 31/2026
Summary of Case 31/2026 The court granted Lakshmi Devi's petition under Section 372 of the Succession Act, declaring her the legal heir of her deceased father Sukhdev and authorizing her to obtain succession certificates for bank deposits and FD holdings totaling approximately ₹10.79 lakhs. The court found that Lakshmi Devi was the sole legal heir, as her father left no will, her mother had divorced him and remarried, and the bank had wrongfully refused to recognize her heirship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts