EXECUTIVE OFFICER NAGAR PALIKA vs FAKEERCHAND ETC Advocate - SITENDER SINGH MALIK — 2/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43,R1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Misc. Appeal - CIVIL MISC APPEAL

CNR: RJHG070000032026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

ADJ1 ADJ2 Nohar Taluka HQ

Judge

2-ADJ II

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O43,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EXECUTIVE OFFICER NAGAR PALIKA

    Adv. SUBHASH CHANDRA BIJARANIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FAKEERCHAND ETC Advocate - SITENDER SINGH MALIK

  2. 2.OMI DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Judgement

    Case Summary: 2/2026 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the Nagar Palika's appeal and upheld the lower court's order of 04-12-2025, which had granted the respondents (Fakeerchand and Omi Devi) an interim injunction against encroachment removal proceedings. The court found that the respondents held valid pattas (land deeds) issued by the village panchayat dated 07-10-1972, which gave them legal rights to occupy the disputed land despite it falling within the Nagar Palika's jurisdiction. The court rejected the Nagar Palika's argument that proper legal procedure was not followed before issuing the notice, noting that the respondents' construction could not be classified as unlawful encroachment given their valid documentary title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ II

  4. 07-May-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ II

  5. 04-May-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ II

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ II

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ II

  8. 16-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ II

  9. 15-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ II

  10. 06-Apr-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ II

  11. 01-Apr-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ II

  12. 24-Mar-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ II

  13. 11-Mar-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ II

  14. 26-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ II

  15. 19-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ II

  16. 12-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ II

  17. 04-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ II

  18. 27-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ II

  19. 12-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ II

  20. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 02-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 2/2026 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the Nagar Palika's appeal and upheld the lower court's order of 04-12-2025, which had granted the respondents (Fakeerchand and Omi Devi) an interim injunction against encroachment removal proceedings. The court found that the respondents held valid pattas (land deeds) issued by the village panchayat dated 07-10-1972, which gave them legal rights to occupy the disputed land despite it falling within the Nagar Palika's jurisdiction. The court rejected the Nagar Palika's argument that proper legal procedure was not followed before issuing the notice, noting that the respondents' construction could not be classified as unlawful encroachment given their valid documentary title. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case