MOHAN SINGH vs LABH SINGH ETC — 8/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CM. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 16th April 2026.
Civil Misc. Appeal - CIVIL MISC APPEAL
CNR: RJHG010001712026
Filing Number
69/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Hanumangarh District HQ
Judge
2-ADJ II
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAN SINGH
Adv. VATAN DEEP SINGH MAAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.LABH SINGH ETC
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Order
Case 8/2026 - Summary Mohan Singh v. Labh Singh (Civil Miscellaneous Appeal) The appellate court dismissed Mohan Singh's appeal and upheld the trial court's interim injunction dated 13.01.2026 favoring Labh Singh. The dispute concerned an irrigation water channel (nala) in agricultural land plots 5, 6, 15, 16, and 25 of survey no. 162/274 that had been authorized since 1996. The court found on prima facie grounds that the water channel existed and was operational for 28 years, supporting the respondent's irrigation needs, and determined that restraining it would cause irreparable harm to other farmers. The appellant failed to establish that this was his only access route to his main-road-adjacent land, thereby lacking sufficient hardship to override the interim injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ II
-
13-Apr-2026
Compliance
ADJ II
-
24-Mar-2026
Compliance
ADJ II
-
05-Mar-2026
Compliance
ADJ II
-
12-Feb-2026
Compliance
ADJ II
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2026
Case 8/2026 - Summary Mohan Singh v. Labh Singh (Civil Miscellaneous Appeal) The appellate court dismissed Mohan Singh's appeal and upheld the trial court's interim injunction dated 13.01.2026 favoring Labh Singh. The dispute concerned an irrigation water channel (nala) in agricultural land plots 5, 6, 15, 16, and 25 of survey no. 162/274 that had been authorized since 1996. The court found on prima facie grounds that the water channel existed and was operational for 28 years, supporting the respondent's irrigation needs, and determined that restraining it would cause irreparable harm to other farmers. The appellant failed to establish that this was his only access route to his main-road-adjacent land, thereby lacking sufficient hardship to override the interim injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts