STATE vs SHAKEEL AHAMAD Advocate - M K JAIN — 1649/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDS120002582016

Filing Number

473/2016

Filing Date

14-Jul-2016

Registration No

1649/2020

Registration Date

14-Jul-2016

Court

ACJM JM - Mahwa Court Complex

Judge

2-Jm

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

81

Police Station

Mandawar

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAKEEL AHAMAD Advocate - M K JAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 27-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 20-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 21-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 09-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 05-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 01-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 30-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 31-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 28-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 19-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 07-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 19-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 13-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 21-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 17-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 19-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 20-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 07-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 04-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 20-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 29-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 22-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 18-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 09-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 13-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 17-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 16-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 16-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 23-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  41. 05-Aug-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  42. 11-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 24-Dec-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 21-Jul-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 20-Jan-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 28-Oct-2017

    Evidence

    Jm

  47. 05-Aug-2017

    Evidence

    Jm

  48. 29-May-2017

    Evidence

    Jm

  49. 18-Feb-2017

    Evidence

    Jm

  50. 19-Nov-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 14-Jul-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1649/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Shakeel Ahmed Khan of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 304 (causing death by negligence/rash driving) due to insufficient evidence. While the prosecution presented witnesses who testified about a Maruti Vain (RJ02-UA-2384) hitting a motorcycle, causing one person's death, the prosecution fatally failed to establish that the accused was actually driving the vehicle at the time of the accident. The court found critical contradictions in witness testimonies regarding timings, locations, and whether the gate was open or closed, combined with the absence of eyewitness identification of the driver, made the case fail the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case