STATE vs ASHOK Advocate - M S SAINI — 1530/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDS120002132016

Filing Number

423/2016

Filing Date

28-May-2016

Registration No

1530/2020

Registration Date

28-May-2016

Court

ACJM JM - Mahwa Court Complex

Judge

2-Jm

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

Mandawar

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK Advocate - M S SAINI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mhawa, Dausa District (Rajasthan) acquitted accused Ashok Kumar on March 30, 2026 in a rash and negligent driving case (IPC Sections 279, 337, 338). The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove that Ashok Kumar was operating the vehicle (RJ34-GA-1148) involved in the accident that injured two persons on March 15, 2016, as no witness could positively identify the driver or establish the vehicle's registration owner through official records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Jm

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 31-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 01-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 30-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 17-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 30-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 06-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 29-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 08-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 03-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 31-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 17-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 07-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 29-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 28-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 02-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 17-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 08-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 13-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 01-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 11-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 17-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 05-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 18-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 08-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 18-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 22-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 24-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 22-Feb-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 25-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 17-Jan-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 18-Sep-2017

    Evidence

    Jm

  41. 10-Jul-2017

    Evidence

    Jm

  42. 15-Apr-2017

    Evidence

    Jm

  43. 24-Dec-2016

    Evidence

    Jm

  44. 27-Sep-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 28-May-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1530/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Mhawa, Dausa District (Rajasthan) acquitted accused Ashok Kumar on March 30, 2026 in a rash and negligent driving case (IPC Sections 279, 337, 338). The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove that Ashok Kumar was operating the vehicle (RJ34-GA-1148) involved in the accident that injured two persons on March 15, 2016, as no witness could positively identify the driver or establish the vehicle's registration owner through official records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case