SATYAWATI vs RAJ. SARKAR Advocate - RATAN CHAND SHARMA — 54/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed on 07th March 2026.
Cr. Revision
CNR: RJDS110006242024
Filing Number
333/2024
Filing Date
25-10-2024
Registration No
54/2024
Registration Date
25-10-2024
Court
ADJ Mahwa Court Complex
Judge
4-ADJ
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
131
Police Station
Mahwa
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATYAWATI
Adv. DHARM SINGH RAJPUT
BALVEER
MANOHARI
BRAJESH
Respondent(s)
RAJ. SARKAR Advocate - RATAN CHAND SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADJ
Restored
Disposed
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Restored |
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-12-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 06-12-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 13-10-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court accepted the investigator's petition and set aside the lower court's orders dated 07.06.2024 and 04.09.2024, which had framed charges under IPC Sections 420 and 120B against the accused. The court found that the lower court had improperly relied solely on the police report without thoroughly examining the case file and evidence, particularly the registered sale deeds which proved the legitimate transfer of property with full consideration paid and proper registration completed before the Sub-Registrar. The court concluded that no prima facie case for fraud could be established against the accused, thereby quashing the charges and exonerating them from prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court accepted the investigator's petition and set aside the lower court's orders dated 07.06.2024 and 04.09.2024, which had framed charges under IPC Sections 420 and 120B against the accused. The court found that the lower court had improperly relied solely on the police report without thoroughly examining the case file and evidence, particularly the registered sale deeds which proved the legitimate transfer of property with full consideration paid and proper registration completed before the Sub-Registrar. The court concluded that no prima facie case for fraud could be established against the accused, thereby quashing the charges and exonerating them from prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts