SATYAWATI vs RAJ. SARKAR Advocate - RATAN CHAND SHARMA — 54/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJDS110006242024

Filing Number

333/2024

Filing Date

25-Oct-2024

Registration No

54/2024

Registration Date

25-Oct-2024

Court

ADJ Mahwa Court Complex

Judge

4-ADJ

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

131

Police Station

Mahwa

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYAWATI

    Adv. DHARM SINGH RAJPUT

  2. 2.BALVEER

  3. 3.MANOHARI

  4. 4.BRAJESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJ. SARKAR Advocate - RATAN CHAND SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary The court accepted the investigator's petition and set aside the lower court's orders dated 07.06.2024 and 04.09.2024, which had framed charges under IPC Sections 420 and 120B against the accused. The court found that the lower court had improperly relied solely on the police report without thoroughly examining the case file and evidence, particularly the registered sale deeds which proved the legitimate transfer of property with full consideration paid and proper registration completed before the Sub-Registrar. The court concluded that no prima facie case for fraud could be established against the accused, thereby quashing the charges and exonerating them from prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Restored

    ADJ

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  6. 16-Dec-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  9. 05-Jul-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  10. 16-Apr-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    ADJ

  11. 06-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 25-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court accepted the investigator's petition and set aside the lower court's orders dated 07.06.2024 and 04.09.2024, which had framed charges under IPC Sections 420 and 120B against the accused. The court found that the lower court had improperly relied solely on the police report without thoroughly examining the case file and evidence, particularly the registered sale deeds which proved the legitimate transfer of property with full consideration paid and proper registration completed before the Sub-Registrar. The court concluded that no prima facie case for fraud could be established against the accused, thereby quashing the charges and exonerating them from prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case