SATYAWATI vs RAJ. SARKAR Advocate - RATAN CHAND SHARMA — 54/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJDS110006242024

Case disposed

Filing Number

333/2024

Filing Date

25-10-2024

Registration No

54/2024

Registration Date

25-10-2024

Court

ADJ Mahwa Court Complex

Judge

4-ADJ

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

131

Police Station

Mahwa

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

SATYAWATI

Adv. DHARM SINGH RAJPUT

BALVEER

MANOHARI

BRAJESH

Respondent(s)

RAJ. SARKAR Advocate - RATAN CHAND SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADJ

07-03-2026

Restored

07-03-2026

Disposed

16-12-2025

Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

06-12-2025

Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

13-10-2025

Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Judgement
07-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary The court accepted the investigator's petition and set aside the lower court's orders dated 07.06.2024 and 04.09.2024, which had framed charges under IPC Sections 420 and 120B against the accused. The court found that the lower court had improperly relied solely on the police report without thoroughly examining the case file and evidence, particularly the registered sale deeds which proved the legitimate transfer of property with full consideration paid and proper registration completed before the Sub-Registrar. The court concluded that no prima facie case for fraud could be established against the accused, thereby quashing the charges and exonerating them from prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court accepted the investigator's petition and set aside the lower court's orders dated 07.06.2024 and 04.09.2024, which had framed charges under IPC Sections 420 and 120B against the accused. The court found that the lower court had improperly relied solely on the police report without thoroughly examining the case file and evidence, particularly the registered sale deeds which proved the legitimate transfer of property with full consideration paid and proper registration completed before the Sub-Registrar. The court concluded that no prima facie case for fraud could be established against the accused, thereby quashing the charges and exonerating them from prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Mahwa Court Complex All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case