STATE vs JATAN SINGH AND ORS Advocate - SH. HARISINGH MEENA — 92/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304B,498A,406. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJDS110002022015

Filing Number

6/2016

Filing Date

07-Dec-2015

Registration No

92/2020

Registration Date

07-Dec-2015

Court

ADJ Mahwa Court Complex

Judge

4-ADJ

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

160

Police Station

Mandawar

Year

2012

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 304B,498A,406

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. ADD. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JATAN SINGH AND ORS Advocate - SH. HARISINGH MEENA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court acquitted two defendants (Gindi Devi and Banwari Lal) of charges under IPC Sections 498-A, 304-B, 406, and 323 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that while the victim (Suman) died within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances, the prosecution failed to establish a proximate link between alleged dowry harassment and her death, a critical requirement for dowry death convictions under Section 304-B. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  10. 09-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  11. 12-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  12. 26-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  13. 05-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  14. 10-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  15. 16-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  16. 28-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  17. 29-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  18. 29-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  19. 11-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  20. 22-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  21. 15-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  22. 09-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  23. 22-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  24. 09-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  25. 04-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  26. 03-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  27. 24-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  28. 23-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  29. 02-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  30. 05-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  31. 06-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  32. 12-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  33. 03-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  34. 16-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  35. 13-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  36. 11-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  37. 13-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  38. 23-Apr-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  39. 08-Jan-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  40. 05-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  41. 18-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  42. 22-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  43. 04-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  44. 04-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  45. 20-Feb-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  46. 22-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

  47. 02-Aug-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

  48. 07-Jun-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

  49. 22-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

  50. 17-Nov-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

  51. 21-Jul-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

  52. 06-Jul-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

  53. 05-Apr-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

  54. 08-Dec-2017

    Charge

  55. 07-Sep-2017

    Charge

  56. 24-Jun-2017

    Charge

  57. 21-Apr-2017

    Charge

  58. 08-Feb-2017

    Charge

  59. 26-Nov-2016

    Charge

  60. 26-Aug-2016

    Charge

  61. 10-Jun-2016

    Charge

  62. 11-Mar-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 07-Dec-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 92/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court acquitted two defendants (Gindi Devi and Banwari Lal) of charges under IPC Sections 498-A, 304-B, 406, and 323 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that while the victim (Suman) died within seven years of marriage under abnormal circumstances, the prosecution failed to establish a proximate link between alleged dowry harassment and her death, a critical requirement for dowry death convictions under Section 304-B. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case