BALVEER vs GOVT OF RAJ — 5/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed on 07th March 2026.
Cr. Revision
CNR: RJDS110001482022
Filing Number
86/2022
Filing Date
05-04-2022
Registration No
5/2022
Registration Date
05-04-2022
Court
ADJ Mahwa Court Complex
Judge
4-ADJ
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BALVEER
Adv. DHARM SINGH RAJPUT
SATYAWATI
Adv. DHARM SINGH RAJPUT
Respondent(s)
GOVT OF RAJ
SHO (Station House Officer) PS (Police Station) MAHWA
JAINARAYAN
YADRAM
DHARM SINGH
BIJENDRA
HARISINGH
GAJANAND
BABULAL
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADJ
Restored
Disposed
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
Service of Summons/bailable warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Restored |
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 02-02-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
| 06-01-2026 | Service of Summons/bailable warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Session Court of Mahwa, Dausa District, rejected a police petition seeking possession of disputed agricultural land (Plot Nos. 632/915, 633/917, 635/919, 628/911) in Village Tikari Jafaran. The court found the petition violated Section 145 CrPC procedures and fundamental principles protecting sacred temple property, holding that the land purchasers (Balveer and Satyavati) had proper legal title through a registered deed dated 24.02.2021, making the police action unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Session Court of Mahwa, Dausa District, rejected a police petition seeking possession of disputed agricultural land (Plot Nos. 632/915, 633/917, 635/919, 628/911) in Village Tikari Jafaran. The court found the petition violated Section 145 CrPC procedures and fundamental principles protecting sacred temple property, holding that the land purchasers (Balveer and Satyavati) had proper legal title through a registered deed dated 24.02.2021, making the police action unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts