STATE vs BABULAL URF RAMBABU Advocate - ABHINANDAN GUPTA — 1424/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,323,341,324. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDS020018852016

Filing Number

4438/2016

Filing Date

21-Nov-2016

Registration No

1424/2020

Registration Date

21-Nov-2016

Court

CJM ACJM JM Dausa District HQ

Judge

5-Acjm No.1

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

136

Police Station

SADAR, DAUSA

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,323,341,324

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABULAL URF RAMBABU Advocate - ABHINANDAN GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm No.1

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Acjm No.1

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm No.1

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm No.1

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm No.1

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No.1

  11. 19-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No.1

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No.1

  14. 05-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  15. 05-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No.1

  16. 04-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  17. 04-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No.1

  18. 21-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No.1

  19. 03-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  20. 10-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  22. 07-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  23. 04-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  24. 29-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  25. 19-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  26. 28-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  27. 20-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  28. 15-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  29. 04-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  30. 11-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  31. 14-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  32. 07-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  33. 04-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  34. 29-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  35. 20-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  36. 18-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  37. 07-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  38. 19-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  39. 20-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  40. 12-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  41. 12-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm No. 2

  42. 23-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  43. 06-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  44. 18-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  45. 09-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  46. 17-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  47. 18-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  48. 26-Jul-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  49. 29-Apr-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  50. 05-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  51. 03-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  52. 06-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  53. 22-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  54. 08-Jan-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  55. 22-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  56. 24-Jun-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  57. 25-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  58. 22-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  59. 19-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  60. 10-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  61. 13-Mar-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    CJM

  62. 07-Oct-2017

    Charge

    CJM

  63. 13-Jul-2017

    Charge

    CJM

  64. 03-May-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 21-Nov-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1424/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dausa acquitted five accused (Babulal, Hariharan, Manish Kumar, Mahendra, and Satirudh) of charges under IPC Sections 147, 323/149, and 324/149, finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies, delayed FIR filing (24 hours later without explanation), and the fact that the complainants filed the case in retaliation after the accused filed a counter-case first, raising serious doubts about the veracity of the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case