STATE vs LALA RAM GURJAR — 612/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJDS020006162016
Filing Number
3160/2016
Filing Date
16-Apr-2016
Registration No
612/2020
Registration Date
16-Apr-2016
Court
CJM ACJM JM Dausa District HQ
Judge
4-CJM
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
184
Police Station
KOTWALI, DAUSA
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. PO
Respondent(s)
-
1.LALA RAM GURJAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
07-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
24-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
13-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
30-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
19-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm No. 2
-
20-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm No. 2
-
03-Oct-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
28-Aug-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
27-Aug-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
10-Jul-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
09-May-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
07-Mar-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
22-Jan-2025
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
04-Dec-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
15-Oct-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
01-Aug-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
03-Jun-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
03-Apr-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
16-Jan-2024
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
27-Oct-2023
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
14-Aug-2023
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm No. 2
-
08-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm No. 2
-
12-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
30-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
15-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
15-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
13-Apr-2022
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
15-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
13-Aug-2021
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
19-May-2021
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
06-Mar-2021
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
08-Dec-2020
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
08-Sep-2020
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
09-Jun-2020
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
08-Apr-2020
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
22-Oct-2019
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
18-Jul-2019
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
23-May-2019
Prosecution Evidence
CJM
-
01-Feb-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
CJM
-
19-Jan-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
CJM
-
26-Oct-2018
Hearing arguments on Charge
CJM
-
23-Aug-2018
Hearing arguments on Charge
CJM
-
22-Jun-2018
Hearing arguments on Charge
CJM
-
08-May-2018
Hearing arguments on Charge
CJM
-
23-Jan-2018
Hearing arguments on Charge
CJM
-
22-Jan-2018
Hearing arguments on Charge
CJM
-
16-Nov-2017
Hearing arguments on Charge
CJM
-
24-Aug-2017
Charge
CJM
-
13-Apr-2017
Charge
CJM
-
07-Mar-2017
Charge
CJM
-
24-Jan-2017
Charge
CJM
-
17-Oct-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 612/2020
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Lalaaram of charges under IPC Section 379 (theft) and MMDR Act Section 4/21 (illegal mineral extraction), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Although the accused was found transporting approximately 9 tons of stone aggregate without valid royalty documents on March 21, 2016, the court identified significant contradictions in witness testimonies, lack of independent witnesses at the scene, and failure to properly weigh the seized materials, which collectively undermined the prosecution's narrative that the minerals were stolen rather than legitimately obtained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts