STATE vs PREM SINGH ETC Advocate - BRIJKISHOR SHARMA — 4975/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 06th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJDH170000332015
Filing Number
4975/2015
Filing Date
01-Jun-2011
Registration No
4975/2015
Registration Date
01-Jun-2011
Court
CJ JM Sarmathura Taluka
Judge
1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed after Full Trial
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
95
Police Station
Sarmathura Police station
Year
2011
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.PREM SINGH ETC Advocate - BRIJKISHOR SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
28-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
09-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
09-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
19-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
05-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
05-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
17-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
29-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
15-Oct-2025
Restored
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
15-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistate
-
17-Jun-2023
Criminal JudgementView PDF
Case Summary The court acquitted three accused persons (Premsingh, Rupsingh, and Remujhi) of charges under IPC Section 447 and the Public Property Damage Prevention Act, 1984, finding insufficient evidence that they unauthorized encroached upon and damaged forest department boundary walls in reserved forest land. The prosecution failed to conclusively prove the defendants' involvement, as no forest official testified to witnessing the encroachment, no revenue records were produced to establish forest department ownership, and contradictions existed in witness statements regarding whether damage was temporary or permanent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2023
Disposed
-
16-Jun-2023
Final arguments
-
05-Jun-2023
Final arguments
-
15-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
-
04-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
-
20-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
-
15-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
-
06-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
-
25-Nov-2022
Prosecution Evidence
-
20-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2011
Case filed
Registration No. 4975/2015
Case Summary The court acquitted three accused persons (Premsingh, Rupsingh, and Remujhi) of charges under IPC Section 447 and the Public Property Damage Prevention Act, 1984, finding insufficient evidence that they unauthorized encroached upon and damaged forest department boundary walls in reserved forest land. The prosecution failed to conclusively prove the defendants' involvement, as no forest official testified to witnessing the encroachment, no revenue records were produced to establish forest department ownership, and contradictions existed in witness statements regarding whether damage was temporary or permanent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts