State Government vs niroti — 694/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,447,379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDH160013722022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

694/2022

Filing Date

11-02-2022

Registration No

694/2022

Registration Date

11-02-2022

Court

CJ JM Saipau Taluka

Judge

1-Civil Judge and JM

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

208

Police Station

Saipau Police Station,Dhaulpur

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 143,447,379

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Adv. apo

Respondent(s)

niroti

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge and JM

30-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

24-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

09-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

27-01-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Judgement

Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Sainpau, Dholpur acquitted five accused persons (Arjun Singh, Bhimsen, Lajaram, Ramesh, and Rajjo) on March 30, 2026, in a criminal case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, and theft under IPC Sections 147, 447, and 379. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient, credible evidence beyond reasonable doubt to prove the allegations that the accused forcibly harvested crops from the complainant's agricultural field on September 25, 2014, and stole bricks and stones despite witness testimonies containing significant contradictions and inconsistencies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

14-11-2024
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Sainpau, Dholpur acquitted five accused persons (Arjun Singh, Bhimsen, Lajaram, Ramesh, and Rajjo) on March 30, 2026, in a criminal case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, and theft under IPC Sections 147, 447, and 379. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient, credible evidence beyond reasonable doubt to prove the allegations that the accused forcibly harvested crops from the complainant's agricultural field on September 25, 2014, and stole bricks and stones despite witness testimonies containing significant contradictions and inconsistencies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJ JM Saipau Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case