State Government vs niroti — 694/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,447,379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJDH160013722022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
694/2022
Filing Date
11-02-2022
Registration No
694/2022
Registration Date
11-02-2022
Court
CJ JM Saipau Taluka
Judge
1-Civil Judge and JM
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
208
Police Station
Saipau Police Station,Dhaulpur
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. apo
Respondent(s)
niroti
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge and JM
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 24-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 09-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 27-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Sainpau, Dholpur acquitted five accused persons (Arjun Singh, Bhimsen, Lajaram, Ramesh, and Rajjo) on March 30, 2026, in a criminal case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, and theft under IPC Sections 147, 447, and 379. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient, credible evidence beyond reasonable doubt to prove the allegations that the accused forcibly harvested crops from the complainant's agricultural field on September 25, 2014, and stole bricks and stones despite witness testimonies containing significant contradictions and inconsistencies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Sainpau, Dholpur acquitted five accused persons (Arjun Singh, Bhimsen, Lajaram, Ramesh, and Rajjo) on March 30, 2026, in a criminal case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, and theft under IPC Sections 147, 447, and 379. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient, credible evidence beyond reasonable doubt to prove the allegations that the accused forcibly harvested crops from the complainant's agricultural field on September 25, 2014, and stole bricks and stones despite witness testimonies containing significant contradictions and inconsistencies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts