sundarlal vs sudhir — 34/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJDH150000392022

Filing Number

34/2022

Filing Date

08-Aug-2016

Registration No

34/2022

Registration Date

08-Aug-2016

Court

CJ JD Saipau Taluka

Judge

1-Civil Judge and Jm

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed after Full Trial

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.sundarlal

    Adv. Satya Prakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.sudhir

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Court Decision (dated 19.03.2026): The Civil Judge of Dholpur granted a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff Sunderlal against defendant Sudheer and others, restraining them from making any construction, alteration, or trespassing on disputed agricultural land (Khata No. 175/900 and 176) in village Pureeni. The court found that the plaintiff has established better ownership and possession rights over the disputed property and rejected the defendant's counter-claims due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge and Jm

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge and Jm

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge and Jm

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge and Jm

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge and Jm

  11. 08-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    Judgment

    Civil Judge and Jm

  13. 22-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  14. 22-Dec-2025

    Judgment

    Civil Judge and Jm

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  16. 18-Dec-2025

    Judgment

    Civil Judge and Jm

  17. 04-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  18. 04-Dec-2025

    Awaiting records

    Civil Judge and Jm

  19. 13-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  20. 13-Nov-2025

    Awaiting records

    Civil Judge and Jm

  21. 01-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  22. 01-Nov-2025

    Awaiting records

    Civil Judge and Jm

  23. 30-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  24. 30-Oct-2025

    Awaiting records

    Civil Judge and Jm

  25. 08-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  26. 08-Oct-2025

    Awaiting records

    Civil Judge and Jm

  27. 04-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  28. 04-Oct-2025

    Awaiting records

    Civil Judge and Jm

  29. 25-Sep-2025

    OrderView PDF

  30. 25-Sep-2025

    Awaiting records

    Civil Judge and Jm

  31. 18-Sep-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Jm

  32. 28-Aug-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Jm

  33. 31-Jul-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Jm

  34. 16-Jul-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Jm

  35. 03-Jul-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Jm

  36. 22-May-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Jm

  37. 03-Apr-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Jm

  38. 24-Oct-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Jm

  39. 06-Mar-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Jm

  40. 14-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 08-Aug-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision (dated 19.03.2026): The Civil Judge of Dholpur granted a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff Sunderlal against defendant Sudheer and others, restraining them from making any construction, alteration, or trespassing on disputed agricultural land (Khata No. 175/900 and 176) in village Pureeni. The court found that the plaintiff has established better ownership and possession rights over the disputed property and rejected the defendant's counter-claims due to insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case