Sureshchand vs Gram vikas adhikari — 3/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section o7 r1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed Ex-Parte on 06th May 2026.

Civil Suit

CNR: RJDH150000032023

Case disposed

Filing Number

3/2023

Filing Date

10-03-2023

Registration No

3/2023

Registration Date

10-03-2023

Court

CJ JD Saipau Taluka

Judge

1-Civil Judge and JM

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed Ex-Parte

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section o7 r1

Petitioner(s)

Sureshchand

Adv. Deepak sharma

Respondent(s)

Gram vikas adhikari

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge and JM

06-05-2026

Disposed

22-04-2026

Orders

25-03-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

13-03-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

11-03-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge of Dholpur, Rajasthan granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiffs (Sureshchandra and others) against the defendants (Village Development Officer and Tahsildar). The court prohibited the defendants from constructing any road or depositing soil on the plaintiffs' inherited agricultural land (khesra nos. 2716 and 2717, totaling ~0.57 hectares) without their consent, and restrained them from interfering with the plaintiffs' use and enjoyment of the property. The decision was based on the plaintiffs' established ownership through inheritance and their testimony that the defendants were unlawfully encroaching on their land boundary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Civil Judge of Dholpur, Rajasthan granted a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiffs (Sureshchandra and others) against the defendants (Village Development Officer and Tahsildar). The court prohibited the defendants from constructing any road or depositing soil on the plaintiffs' inherited agricultural land (khesra nos. 2716 and 2717, totaling ~0.57 hectares) without their consent, and restrained them from interfering with the plaintiffs' use and enjoyment of the property. The decision was based on the plaintiffs' established ownership through inheritance and their testimony that the defendants were unlawfully encroaching on their land boundary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJ JD Saipau Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case