Niranjan vs Mahaveer prasad — 8/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 28th April 2026.

REG. CIVIL SUIT

CNR: RJDH070000112026

Case disposed

Filing Number

11/2026

Filing Date

09-12-2016

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

09-12-2016

Court

CJ SD Dholpur Bari HQ

Judge

2-ACJM NO 02

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Decreed after Full Trial

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Niranjan

Respondent(s)

Mahaveer prasad

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM NO 02

28-04-2026

Disposed

27-04-2026

Final arguments

18-04-2026

Final arguments

06-04-2026

Final arguments

27-03-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

Interim Orders

07-02-2026
Order
13-02-2026
Order
11-03-2026
Order
18-03-2026
Order
27-03-2026
Order
06-04-2026
Order
27-04-2026
Copy of Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Baadi, Dholpur (Case No. 08/2026, decided 28.04.2026) ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in a landlord-tenant eviction dispute. The court ordered the defendants (tenants) to vacate a commercial shop within three months and pay ₹2,000 per month as "means profit" (compensation for unlawful occupation) from the date of suit filing (08.12.2016) until vacation. The court found that the plaintiffs validly terminated the tenancy through a Section 106 Transfer of Property Act notice and that the defendants had no legitimate defense to the eviction claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Baadi, Dholpur (Case No. 08/2026, decided 28.04.2026) ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in a landlord-tenant eviction dispute. The court ordered the defendants (tenants) to vacate a commercial shop within three months and pay ₹2,000 per month as "means profit" (compensation for unlawful occupation) from the date of suit filing (08.12.2016) until vacation. The court found that the plaintiffs validly terminated the tenancy through a Section 106 Transfer of Property Act notice and that the defendants had no legitimate defense to the eviction claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJ SD Dholpur Bari HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case