Niranjan vs Mahaveer prasad — 8/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--Decreed after Full Trial on 28th April 2026.
REG. CIVIL SUIT
CNR: RJDH070000112026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
09-Dec-2016
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
09-Dec-2016
Court
CJ SD Dholpur Bari HQ
Judge
2-Acjm No 02
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed after Full Trial
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Niranjan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahaveer prasad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Acjm No 02
-
27-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Baadi, Dholpur (Case No. 08/2026, decided 28.04.2026) ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in a landlord-tenant eviction dispute. The court ordered the defendants (tenants) to vacate a commercial shop within three months and pay ₹2,000 per month as "means profit" (compensation for unlawful occupation) from the date of suit filing (08.12.2016) until vacation. The court found that the plaintiffs validly terminated the tenancy through a Section 106 Transfer of Property Act notice and that the defendants had no legitimate defense to the eviction claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Acjm No 02
-
18-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Acjm No 02
-
06-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Acjm No 02
-
27-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Acjm No 02
-
18-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Acjm No 02
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Defendant Evidence
Acjm No 02
-
13-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Defendant Evidence
Acjm No 02
-
07-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
07-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2026
Court Decision Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Baadi, Dholpur (Case No. 08/2026, decided 28.04.2026) ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in a landlord-tenant eviction dispute. The court ordered the defendants (tenants) to vacate a commercial shop within three months and pay ₹2,000 per month as "means profit" (compensation for unlawful occupation) from the date of suit filing (08.12.2016) until vacation. The court found that the plaintiffs validly terminated the tenancy through a Section 106 Transfer of Property Act notice and that the defendants had no legitimate defense to the eviction claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts