State Government APP vs Bantu urf gajenddra Advocate - Omveer Gurjar — 1450/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 382. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJDH020034612022
Filing Number
3247/2022
Filing Date
08-07-2022
Registration No
1450/2022
Registration Date
08-07-2022
Court
CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ
Judge
6-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
102
Police Station
Kotwali Police Station,Dhaulpur
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Bantu urf gajenddra Advocate - Omveer Gurjar
Naresh urf badshah
Adv. Omveer Gurjar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 24-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Case: State v. Naresh alias Badshah and others, FIR 1450/2022 (Dholpur) Decision (13.04.2026): The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Bantu alias Gajendra of robbery charges under IPC Section 382 due to insufficient evidence, finding contradictions in witness testimonies and gaps in the prosecution's case regarding recovery of the motorcycle. However, two co-accused (Naresh and Ashu) remain absconding, and their prosecution continues separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary Case: State v. Naresh alias Badshah and others, FIR 1450/2022 (Dholpur) Decision (13.04.2026): The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Bantu alias Gajendra of robbery charges under IPC Section 382 due to insufficient evidence, finding contradictions in witness testimonies and gaps in the prosecution's case regarding recovery of the motorcycle. However, two co-accused (Naresh and Ashu) remain absconding, and their prosecution continues separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts