State Government APP vs Sahrukh Advocate - Shareef Khan — 1508/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,316(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJDH020033852024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3373/2024
Filing Date
08-11-2024
Registration No
1508/2024
Registration Date
08-11-2024
Court
CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ
Judge
6-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
237
Police Station
Mahila Police Station,Dhaulpur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Sahrukh Advocate - Shareef Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 11-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 17-11-2025 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 03-09-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court: Judicial Magistrate, Dholpur, Rajasthan Case No.: 1508/2024 Date: 27.03.2026 The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Shahruakh under Section 85, 316(2) BNS, finding insufficient evidence to prove cruelty charges. The prosecution alleged the accused harassed his wife (married 15.12.2021) by demanding additional dowry (specifically a car) and subjected her to physical and mental torture; however, the court found the prosecution's evidence, particularly witness testimonies, contradictory and unconvincing, and held that the allegations of dowry-related cruelty were not adequately proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Judicial Magistrate, Dholpur, Rajasthan Case No.: 1508/2024 Date: 27.03.2026 The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Shahruakh under Section 85, 316(2) BNS, finding insufficient evidence to prove cruelty charges. The prosecution alleged the accused harassed his wife (married 15.12.2021) by demanding additional dowry (specifically a car) and subjected her to physical and mental torture; however, the court found the prosecution's evidence, particularly witness testimonies, contradictory and unconvincing, and held that the allegations of dowry-related cruelty were not adequately proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts