State vs Manager Kray Vikray — 276/2015

Case under Essential Commodities Act Section 3,7. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. CASE

CNR: RJDH020011352015

Filing Number

276/2015

Filing Date

06-Nov-2015

Registration No

276/2015

Registration Date

06-Nov-2015

Court

CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ

Judge

4-CJM

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act Section 3,7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APP I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manager Kray Vikray

  2. 2.Mss Internation Biotech

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dholpur acquitted accused Hemendra Tyagi under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1985, finding that the sample collection procedure violated prescribed protocols—specifically that sampling was conducted without using the quaternary method, from plastic bags instead of sealed bags, and without proper documentation of these procedural deviations. The court held that due to these procedural irregularities in sample collection and testing, the prosecution failed to establish a reliable case against the accused, warranting acquittal based on benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    CJM

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    CJM

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    CJM

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  13. 14-Jan-2026

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  14. 29-Nov-2025

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  15. 08-Sep-2025

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  16. 09-Jul-2025

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  17. 09-Jun-2025

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  18. 29-Mar-2025

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  19. 16-Jan-2025

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  20. 26-Nov-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  21. 07-Oct-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  22. 29-Jun-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  23. 29-Apr-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  24. 26-Mar-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  25. 25-Mar-2024

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  26. 07-Dec-2023

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  27. 20-Oct-2023

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  28. 28-Jul-2023

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  29. 10-Apr-2023

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  30. 23-Feb-2023

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  31. 10-Nov-2022

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  32. 28-Jun-2022

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  33. 20-Apr-2022

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  34. 09-Feb-2022

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  35. 18-Dec-2021

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  36. 21-Sep-2021

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  37. 03-Jul-2021

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  38. 09-Apr-2021

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  39. 07-Apr-2021

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  40. 18-Feb-2021

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  41. 21-Nov-2020

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  42. 15-Sep-2020

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  43. 14-Jul-2020

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  44. 04-Jun-2020

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  45. 24-Apr-2020

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  46. 19-Feb-2020

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  47. 08-Jan-2020

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  48. 05-Oct-2019

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  49. 27-Aug-2019

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  50. 20-May-2019

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  51. 27-Mar-2019

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  52. 06-Feb-2019

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  53. 12-Nov-2018

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  54. 07-Sep-2018

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  55. 26-Jun-2018

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  56. 02-Apr-2018

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  57. 05-Jan-2018

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  58. 19-Sep-2017

    Appearence

    CJM

  59. 14-Jul-2017

    Appearence

    CJM

  60. 25-Apr-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 06-Nov-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 276/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dholpur acquitted accused Hemendra Tyagi under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1985, finding that the sample collection procedure violated prescribed protocols—specifically that sampling was conducted without using the quaternary method, from plastic bags instead of sealed bags, and without proper documentation of these procedural deviations. The court held that due to these procedural irregularities in sample collection and testing, the prosecution failed to establish a reliable case against the accused, warranting acquittal based on benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case