State vs Manager Kray Vikray — 276/2015
Case under Essential Commodities Act Section 3,7. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: RJDH020011352015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
276/2015
Filing Date
06-11-2015
Registration No
276/2015
Registration Date
06-11-2015
Court
CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ
Judge
4-CJM
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APP I
Respondent(s)
Manager Kray Vikray
Mss Internation Biotech
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CJM
Disposed
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Appearance of accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea | |
| 12-03-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea | |
| 09-03-2026 | Framing of Charge/ Plea | |
| 05-03-2026 | Appearance of accused |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dholpur acquitted accused Hemendra Tyagi under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1985, finding that the sample collection procedure violated prescribed protocols—specifically that sampling was conducted without using the quaternary method, from plastic bags instead of sealed bags, and without proper documentation of these procedural deviations. The court held that due to these procedural irregularities in sample collection and testing, the prosecution failed to establish a reliable case against the accused, warranting acquittal based on benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dholpur acquitted accused Hemendra Tyagi under Section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1985, finding that the sample collection procedure violated prescribed protocols—specifically that sampling was conducted without using the quaternary method, from plastic bags instead of sealed bags, and without proper documentation of these procedural deviations. The court held that due to these procedural irregularities in sample collection and testing, the prosecution failed to establish a reliable case against the accused, warranting acquittal based on benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts