State Government APP vs Parsadi Advocate - AMIT KUMAR UPADHYAY — 110/2013

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120b. Status: Hearing arguments on Charge. Next hearing: 16th May 2026.

Hearing arguments on Charge Next hearing 16-May-2026

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDH020011292013

Filing Number

110/2013

Filing Date

04-Apr-2013

Registration No

110/2013

Registration Date

04-Apr-2013

Court

CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ

Judge

5-Acjm

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

287

Police Station

Nihal Ganj Police Station,Dhaulpur

Year

2012

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,471,120b

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Parsadi Advocate - AMIT KUMAR UPADHYAY

  2. 2.Suresh chand

  3. 3.ramveer

  4. 4.murari

Case History

  1. 16-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-May-2026

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The accused's plea for anticipatory bail was rejected. The court found the allegations credible and ordered that if the accused is arrested, bail may be granted only after proper inquiry and upon furnishing security of Rs. 1,50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2 lakhs each. The accused was directed to surrender before the jail authority in Dholpur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Acjm

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  13. 09-Jan-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  14. 24-Dec-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  15. 10-Dec-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  16. 29-Nov-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  17. 15-Nov-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  18. 04-Nov-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  19. 17-Oct-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  20. 08-Oct-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  21. 26-Sep-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  22. 20-Sep-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  23. 12-Sep-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  24. 06-Sep-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  25. 27-Aug-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  26. 14-Aug-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  27. 05-Aug-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  28. 23-Jul-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-II

  29. 11-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 04-Apr-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 110/2013

casestatus.in Summary

The accused's plea for anticipatory bail was rejected. The court found the allegations credible and ordered that if the accused is arrested, bail may be granted only after proper inquiry and upon furnishing security of Rs. 1,50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 2 lakhs each. The accused was directed to surrender before the jail authority in Dholpur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case