State (APP) vs RAMNIWAS URFNAHENU Advocate - SHANTANU KUMAR SHARMA — 579/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,332,353,379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJDH020009992023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
937/2023
Filing Date
02-12-2010
Registration No
579/2023
Registration Date
02-12-2010
Court
CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ
Judge
5-ACJM
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
76
Police Station
Mania Police StationDhaulpur
Year
2008
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State (APP)
Adv. ACJM APP
Respondent(s)
RAMNIWAS URFNAHENU Advocate - SHANTANU KUMAR SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ACJM
Disposed
Appearance of accused
Appearance of accused
Appearance of accused
Appearance of accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Appearance of accused | |
| 09-03-2026 | Appearance of accused | |
| 27-02-2026 | Appearance of accused | |
| 13-02-2026 | Appearance of accused |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dholpur acquitted 15 accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 379, and 120B along with Wildlife Protection Act Sections 29/51, 52. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the allegations against the accused with sufficient evidence. Key inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the identification of accused persons, lack of independent witnesses, absence of proper documentation of the alleged Chandal River prohibited zone trespass, and failure to recover any contraband evidence led to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dholpur acquitted 15 accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 379, and 120B along with Wildlife Protection Act Sections 29/51, 52. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the allegations against the accused with sufficient evidence. Key inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the identification of accused persons, lack of independent witnesses, absence of proper documentation of the alleged Chandal River prohibited zone trespass, and failure to recover any contraband evidence led to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts