State (APP) vs RAMNIWAS URFNAHENU Advocate - SHANTANU KUMAR SHARMA — 579/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,332,353,379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDH020009992023

Filing Number

937/2023

Filing Date

02-Dec-2010

Registration No

579/2023

Registration Date

02-Dec-2010

Court

CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ

Judge

5-Acjm

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

76

Police Station

Mania Police StationDhaulpur

Year

2008

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,332,353,379
Wild Life (Protection) Act Section 29,51

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State (APP)

    Adv. ACJM APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMNIWAS URFNAHENU Advocate - SHANTANU KUMAR SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of judgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dholpur acquitted 15 accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 379, and 120B along with Wildlife Protection Act Sections 29/51, 52. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the allegations against the accused with sufficient evidence. Key inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the identification of accused persons, lack of independent witnesses, absence of proper documentation of the alleged Chandal River prohibited zone trespass, and failure to recover any contraband evidence led to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  13. 27-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  15. 19-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  16. 08-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Acjm

  17. 03-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Acjm

  18. 17-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Acjm

  19. 06-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Acjm

  20. 27-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Acjm

  21. 24-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Acjm

  22. 18-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  23. 18-Nov-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  24. 10-Nov-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  25. 29-Oct-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  26. 17-Oct-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  27. 07-Oct-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  28. 17-Sep-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  29. 08-Sep-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  30. 30-Aug-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  31. 25-Aug-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  32. 19-Aug-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  33. 11-Aug-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  34. 04-Aug-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acjm

  35. 16-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  36. 08-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  37. 01-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  38. 17-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  39. 10-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  40. 03-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  41. 27-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  42. 21-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  43. 14-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  44. 01-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  45. 22-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  46. 08-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  47. 28-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  48. 19-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  49. 06-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  50. 25-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  51. 15-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  52. 06-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  53. 29-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  54. 22-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  55. 06-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  56. 17-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  57. 10-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  58. 30-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  59. 22-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  60. 13-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  61. 24-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm

  62. 05-Oct-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  63. 12-Sep-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  64. 14-Aug-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  65. 01-Jun-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  66. 15-Apr-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  67. 13-Mar-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  68. 12-Feb-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  69. 19-Dec-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  70. 29-Aug-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  71. 12-Jul-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  72. 06-May-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acjm

  73. 28-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  74. 02-Dec-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. 579/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dholpur acquitted 15 accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 379, and 120B along with Wildlife Protection Act Sections 29/51, 52. The court found the prosecution failed to prove the allegations against the accused with sufficient evidence. Key inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the identification of accused persons, lack of independent witnesses, absence of proper documentation of the alleged Chandal River prohibited zone trespass, and failure to recover any contraband evidence led to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case