State Government APP vs Charan singh Advocate - Mahesh Mudgal — 525/2021

Case under Excise (Spirits) Act Section 16/54. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDH020007702021

Filing Number

765/2021

Filing Date

04-Mar-2021

Registration No

525/2021

Registration Date

04-Mar-2021

Court

CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ

Judge

6-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

Excise Police Station, Dholpur

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Excise (Spirits) Act Section 16/54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

    Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Charan singh Advocate - Mahesh Mudgal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of judgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Dholpur acquitted Charan Singh (age 38) of charges under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for alleged illegal possession of 5 liters of country liquor found during a search on March 8, 2020. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquor was recovered from the accused's exclusive possession, citing deficiencies in witness testimony, lack of documentary evidence proving ownership of the residence, and failure to present independent witnesses or produce the seized contraband in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  12. 30-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  13. 10-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  14. 03-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  15. 09-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  16. 15-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  17. 20-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  18. 05-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

  19. 09-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

  20. 16-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

  21. 11-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

  22. 05-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

  23. 07-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

  24. 25-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  25. 30-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  26. 18-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  27. 08-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  28. 05-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

  29. 01-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-I

  30. 25-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate-I

  31. 02-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 04-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 525/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Dholpur acquitted Charan Singh (age 38) of charges under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act for alleged illegal possession of 5 liters of country liquor found during a search on March 8, 2020. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquor was recovered from the accused's exclusive possession, citing deficiencies in witness testimony, lack of documentary evidence proving ownership of the residence, and failure to present independent witnesses or produce the seized contraband in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case