State Government APP vs Ramdin Advocate - Shareef Khan — 261/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJDH020002402026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
240/2026
Filing Date
20-07-2015
Registration No
261/2026
Registration Date
20-07-2015
Court
CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ
Judge
6-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
Sadar Police Station,Dhaulpur
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Ramdin Advocate - Shareef Khan
deva @ devendra
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 05-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 24-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 10-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Dholpur acquitted both accused, Ramdeen and Deva (also known as Devendra), of charges under Section 379 IPC (theft) in a case involving alleged theft of school property from a government school in 2015. The court found that while the prosecution presented nine witnesses and fourteen documents, the testimonies contained contradictions and failed to conclusively prove that the accused committed the alleged theft. The court determined there was reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt and therefore acquitted them, requiring them to furnish personal bonds of ₹10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Dholpur acquitted both accused, Ramdeen and Deva (also known as Devendra), of charges under Section 379 IPC (theft) in a case involving alleged theft of school property from a government school in 2015. The court found that while the prosecution presented nine witnesses and fourteen documents, the testimonies contained contradictions and failed to conclusively prove that the accused committed the alleged theft. The court determined there was reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt and therefore acquitted them, requiring them to furnish personal bonds of ₹10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts