State Government APP vs Ramdin Advocate - Shareef Khan — 261/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDH020002402026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

240/2026

Filing Date

20-07-2015

Registration No

261/2026

Registration Date

20-07-2015

Court

CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ

Judge

6-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

49

Police Station

Sadar Police Station,Dhaulpur

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 379

Petitioner(s)

State Government APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Adv. Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Ramdin Advocate - Shareef Khan

deva @ devendra

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

05-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

24-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

10-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of judgement

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Dholpur acquitted both accused, Ramdeen and Deva (also known as Devendra), of charges under Section 379 IPC (theft) in a case involving alleged theft of school property from a government school in 2015. The court found that while the prosecution presented nine witnesses and fourteen documents, the testimonies contained contradictions and failed to conclusively prove that the accused committed the alleged theft. The court determined there was reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt and therefore acquitted them, requiring them to furnish personal bonds of ₹10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

24-02-2026
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate of Dholpur acquitted both accused, Ramdeen and Deva (also known as Devendra), of charges under Section 379 IPC (theft) in a case involving alleged theft of school property from a government school in 2015. The court found that while the prosecution presented nine witnesses and fourteen documents, the testimonies contained contradictions and failed to conclusively prove that the accused committed the alleged theft. The court determined there was reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt and therefore acquitted them, requiring them to furnish personal bonds of ₹10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJM ACJM JM Dholpur District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case