KAMLESH vs MANAGING DIRECTOR JVVVNL JAIPUR Advocate - narendra saxena — 48/2022

Case under Fatal Accidents Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit

CNR: RJDH010016672022

Filing Number

199/2022

Filing Date

11-Oct-2022

Registration No

48/2022

Registration Date

11-Oct-2022

Court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Fatal Accidents Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMLESH

    Adv. NARENDRA SINGH KUSHVAH

  2. 2.VIRENDRA

  3. 3.KIRAN DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANAGING DIRECTOR JVVVNL JAIPUR Advocate - narendra saxena

  2. 2.AEN JVVVNL DHOLPUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of judgementView PDF

    Summary The District Court of Dholpur dismissed the fatal accident suit filed by the heirs of Ajju (deceased) against Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL). The court found that while death by electric shock was proven, the plaintiffs failed to establish that a power line was broken and fell due to the electricity department's negligence—instead finding that the deceased's own negligence (raising his hand into an active 11 KV line while eating tobacco) caused the accident, with no evidence that prior permission from the electricity department was obtained for the construction work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  8. 28-Nov-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  10. 15-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  11. 04-Aug-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  12. 25-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  13. 22-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  14. 28-May-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  15. 23-Apr-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  16. 24-Mar-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  17. 06-Mar-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  18. 13-Feb-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  19. 07-Feb-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  20. 13-Jan-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  21. 06-Dec-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  22. 06-Nov-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  23. 24-Oct-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  24. 07-Oct-2024

    Defendant Evidence

    District Judge

  25. 25-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  26. 21-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  27. 22-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  28. 29-May-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  29. 04-May-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  30. 05-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  31. 13-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  32. 31-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  33. 03-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  34. 09-Nov-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  35. 06-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  36. 11-Aug-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    District Judge

  37. 04-Jul-2023

    Issues

    District Judge

  38. 05-May-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District Judge

  39. 27-Mar-2023

    Issues

    District Judge

  40. 14-Feb-2023

    Issues

    District Judge

  41. 17-Jan-2023

    Appearance of parties/ advocates

    District Judge

  42. 29-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 11-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Court of Dholpur dismissed the fatal accident suit filed by the heirs of Ajju (deceased) against Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL). The court found that while death by electric shock was proven, the plaintiffs failed to establish that a power line was broken and fell due to the electricity department's negligence—instead finding that the deceased's own negligence (raising his hand into an active 11 KV line while eating tobacco) caused the accident, with no evidence that prior permission from the electricity department was obtained for the construction work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case