State Government vs Rambharat Advocate - Daudayal sharma — 73/2024
Case under Arms Act Section 3/25,5/25,3/25(1-B)A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJDH010013042024
Filing Number
1422/2024
Filing Date
23-Aug-2024
Registration No
73/2024
Registration Date
23-Aug-2024
Court
DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
139
Police Station
Police Station Rajakhera Dhaulpur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rambharat Advocate - Daudayal sharma
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dholpur acquitted Rambhart (accused) of all charges under Sections 3/25(6), 5/25, and 3/25(1-B)(A) of the Arms Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical evidentiary gaps including missing documentation, unidentified witnesses, and procedural irregularities in the arrest and weapon seizure process. The accused was granted the benefit of doubt and discharged as acquitted, with bail conditions modified accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Orders
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Orders
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 73/2024
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dholpur acquitted Rambhart (accused) of all charges under Sections 3/25(6), 5/25, and 3/25(1-B)(A) of the Arms Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical evidentiary gaps including missing documentation, unidentified witnesses, and procedural irregularities in the arrest and weapon seizure process. The accused was granted the benefit of doubt and discharged as acquitted, with bail conditions modified accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts