State Government vs Rambharat Advocate - Daudayal sharma — 73/2024
Case under Arms Act Section 3/25,5/25,3/25(1-B)A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJDH010013042024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1422/2024
Filing Date
23-08-2024
Registration No
73/2024
Registration Date
23-08-2024
Court
DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
139
Police Station
Police Station Rajakhera Dhaulpur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
Rambharat Advocate - Daudayal sharma
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 09-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 28-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dholpur acquitted Rambhart (accused) of all charges under Sections 3/25(6), 5/25, and 3/25(1-B)(A) of the Arms Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical evidentiary gaps including missing documentation, unidentified witnesses, and procedural irregularities in the arrest and weapon seizure process. The accused was granted the benefit of doubt and discharged as acquitted, with bail conditions modified accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dholpur acquitted Rambhart (accused) of all charges under Sections 3/25(6), 5/25, and 3/25(1-B)(A) of the Arms Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical evidentiary gaps including missing documentation, unidentified witnesses, and procedural irregularities in the arrest and weapon seizure process. The accused was granted the benefit of doubt and discharged as acquitted, with bail conditions modified accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts