State Government vs Rambharat Advocate - Daudayal sharma — 73/2024

Case under Arms Act Section 3/25,5/25,3/25(1-B)A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th April 2026.

Session Case

CNR: RJDH010013042024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1422/2024

Filing Date

23-08-2024

Registration No

73/2024

Registration Date

23-08-2024

Court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ

Judge

2-Addl District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

139

Police Station

Police Station Rajakhera Dhaulpur

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 3/25,5/25,3/25(1-B)A

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

Rambharat Advocate - Daudayal sharma

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge

13-04-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Orders

09-04-2026

Orders

28-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

23-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

13-04-2026
Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dholpur acquitted Rambhart (accused) of all charges under Sections 3/25(6), 5/25, and 3/25(1-B)(A) of the Arms Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical evidentiary gaps including missing documentation, unidentified witnesses, and procedural irregularities in the arrest and weapon seizure process. The accused was granted the benefit of doubt and discharged as acquitted, with bail conditions modified accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dholpur acquitted Rambhart (accused) of all charges under Sections 3/25(6), 5/25, and 3/25(1-B)(A) of the Arms Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical evidentiary gaps including missing documentation, unidentified witnesses, and procedural irregularities in the arrest and weapon seizure process. The accused was granted the benefit of doubt and discharged as acquitted, with bail conditions modified accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case