State vs Avadhesh Advocate - Shailendra Lawaniya — 58/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,304b. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJDH010010222021
Filing Number
867/2021
Filing Date
20-07-2021
Registration No
58/2021
Registration Date
20-07-2021
Court
DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
Police Station Rajakhera Dhaulpur
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. p.p.
Respondent(s)
Avadhesh Advocate - Shailendra Lawaniya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 17-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 09-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 17-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Session Court of Dholpur acquitted the accused Avdhesh on charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 302 (murder), and 304-B (causing death by negligence) due to insufficient evidence. While the court found that the victim's death occurred in abnormal circumstances within seven years of marriage (satisfying one element of dowry death), the prosecution failed to prove that dowry was demanded or that the accused caused the death. The victim's own family members, who testified as prosecution witnesses, did not corroborate the dowry harassment allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Session Court of Dholpur acquitted the accused Avdhesh on charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 302 (murder), and 304-B (causing death by negligence) due to insufficient evidence. While the court found that the victim's death occurred in abnormal circumstances within seven years of marriage (satisfying one element of dowry death), the prosecution failed to prove that dowry was demanded or that the accused caused the death. The victim's own family members, who testified as prosecution witnesses, did not corroborate the dowry harassment allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts