State vs Dharmendra Advocate - Girish Gurjar — 53/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,307,379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th April 2026.

Session Case

CNR: RJDH010009802021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

837/2021

Filing Date

14-07-2021

Registration No

53/2021

Registration Date

14-07-2021

Court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

260

Police Station

Police Station Rajakhera Dhaulpur

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 353,307,379
Wild Life (Protection) Act Section 29/51
RAJASTHAN FOREST ACT 1953 Section 41,42
Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act Section 3

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. p.p.

Respondent(s)

Dharmendra Advocate - Girish Gurjar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge

13-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Judgment

09-03-2026

Judgment

11-02-2026

Judgment

04-02-2026

Judgment

Final Orders / Judgements

13-04-2026
Copy of judgement

The Sessions Court in Dholpur acquitted the accused Dharmendra on charges under IPC sections 379 (theft), 353 (criminal force), 307 (attempt to murder), Wildlife Protection Act 29/51, and Forest Act sections 41-42, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the truck involved in the incident. The court noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and absence of direct identification, granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court in Dholpur acquitted the accused Dharmendra on charges under IPC sections 379 (theft), 353 (criminal force), 307 (attempt to murder), Wildlife Protection Act 29/51, and Forest Act sections 41-42, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the truck involved in the incident. The court noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and absence of direct identification, granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case