State vs Dharmendra Advocate - Girish Gurjar — 53/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,307,379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJDH010009802021
Filing Number
837/2021
Filing Date
14-Jul-2021
Registration No
53/2021
Registration Date
14-Jul-2021
Court
DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
260
Police Station
Police Station Rajakhera Dhaulpur
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. p.p.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dharmendra Advocate - Girish Gurjar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Copy of judgementView PDF
The Sessions Court in Dholpur acquitted the accused Dharmendra on charges under IPC sections 379 (theft), 353 (criminal force), 307 (attempt to murder), Wildlife Protection Act 29/51, and Forest Act sections 41-42, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the truck involved in the incident. The court noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and absence of direct identification, granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Judgment
District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgment
District Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Judgment
District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Judgment
District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Final arguments
District Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
07-May-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
05-Apr-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
20-Feb-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
03-Feb-2025
Final arguments
District Judge
-
13-Jan-2025
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge
-
20-Dec-2024
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge
-
03-Dec-2024
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
District Judge
-
25-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
24-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
16-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
01-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
05-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
14-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
16-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
12-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
15-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
21-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
06-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
04-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
23-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
23-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
21-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
01-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Spl Judge SC ST Cases
-
16-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
09-Nov-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
28-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
28-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
10-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
01-Apr-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
25-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
02-Dec-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
08-Oct-2021
Prosecution Evidence
District Judge
-
18-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2021
The Sessions Court in Dholpur acquitted the accused Dharmendra on charges under IPC sections 379 (theft), 353 (criminal force), 307 (attempt to murder), Wildlife Protection Act 29/51, and Forest Act sections 41-42, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the truck involved in the incident. The court noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and absence of direct identification, granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts