State Government vs paras Advocate - Kanta prasad Sharma — 64/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,307,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJDH010007522025
Filing Number
623/2025
Filing Date
19-03-2025
Registration No
64/2025
Registration Date
20-05-2025
Court
DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
109
Police Station
Nihal Ganj Police Station,Dhaulpur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. PP Dholpur
Respondent(s)
paras Advocate - Kanta prasad Sharma
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Final arguments
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 21-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 26-11-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Dholpur acquitted the accused Paras (age 21) of charges under IPC Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 341 (wrongful restraint), 307 (attempt to murder), and 34 (common intention). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses turned hostile and the evidence presented by the police report lacked sufficient corroboration. The court noted inconsistencies in witness statements and absence of credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged crimes of March 13, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Dholpur acquitted the accused Paras (age 21) of charges under IPC Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 341 (wrongful restraint), 307 (attempt to murder), and 34 (common intention). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses turned hostile and the evidence presented by the police report lacked sufficient corroboration. The court noted inconsistencies in witness statements and absence of credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged crimes of March 13, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts