Arman urf Video vs State Government Advocate - PP Dholpur — 264/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJDH010004622026

Filing Number

404/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

264/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

430

Police Station

Nihal Ganj Police Station,Dhaulpur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arman urf Video

    Adv. Omveer Gurjar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) Dholpur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of judgementView PDF

    The Sessions Court in Dholpur, Rajasthan granted bail to accused Arman (alias Vidiyal), age 24, in a theft case (FIR 430/2025) under IPC Sections 305(A), 331(4), and 112(2). The court found that since the investigation was still ongoing and the charges did not warrant life imprisonment or death penalty, bail was justified; the accused was ordered released on two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each and a personal bond of Rs. 50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 264/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court in Dholpur, Rajasthan granted bail to accused Arman (alias Vidiyal), age 24, in a theft case (FIR 430/2025) under IPC Sections 305(A), 331(4), and 112(2). The court found that since the investigation was still ongoing and the charges did not warrant life imprisonment or death penalty, bail was justified; the accused was ordered released on two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each and a personal bond of Rs. 50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case