Sumit kumar tyagi vs State Government Advocate - PP Dholpur — 263/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJDH010004572026

Filing Number

399/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

263/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

Cyber Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sumit kumar tyagi

    Adv. Amar Kant Tyagi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) Dholpur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of judgementView PDF

    Case Summary Case: Cr. Misc Case No. 263/2026, Session Court, Dholpur, Rajasthan Date: 09/03/2026 The Session Judge granted bail to Sumit Kumar Tyagi (age 23) under Section 483 CrPC in a cybercrime case (FIR 03/2026, Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS and Section 66 IT Act). The court found that since the case was still under investigation with no serious charges warranting life imprisonment or capital punishment, bail was appropriate. The applicant was directed to furnish two personal bonds of ₹25,000 each and a cash security of ₹50,000 to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dholpur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 263/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: Cr. Misc Case No. 263/2026, Session Court, Dholpur, Rajasthan Date: 09/03/2026 The Session Judge granted bail to Sumit Kumar Tyagi (age 23) under Section 483 CrPC in a cybercrime case (FIR 03/2026, Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS and Section 66 IT Act). The court found that since the case was still under investigation with no serious charges warranting life imprisonment or capital punishment, bail was appropriate. The applicant was directed to furnish two personal bonds of ₹25,000 each and a cash security of ₹50,000 to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dholpur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case