Dharmendra vs State Government Advocate - PP Dholpur — 258/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJDH010004522026

Filing Number

394/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

258/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

90

Police Station

Mania Police Station,Dhaulpur

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dharmendra

    Adv. Anil Sharma

  2. 2.Satish kumar

  3. 3.Bhagirath

  4. 4.Bijendra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) Dholpur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of judgementView PDF

    The Session Court in Dholpur, Rajasthan granted bail to four accused (Dharmendra, Satish, Bhagirath, and Bijendra) charged under Section 13 of the Gambling Act and Section 112(2) BNS for illegal gambling. The court found that the accused's alleged offense does not warrant life imprisonment or death penalty, investigation is still ongoing, and bail is justified based on case facts and circumstances, ordering each accused to furnish bail bonds of ₹25,000 and personal recognizance of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 258/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Session Court in Dholpur, Rajasthan granted bail to four accused (Dharmendra, Satish, Bhagirath, and Bijendra) charged under Section 13 of the Gambling Act and Section 112(2) BNS for illegal gambling. The court found that the accused's alleged offense does not warrant life imprisonment or death penalty, investigation is still ongoing, and bail is justified based on case facts and circumstances, ordering each accused to furnish bail bonds of ₹25,000 and personal recognizance of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case