Haripal Singh vs State Government Advocate - PP Dholpur — 253/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJDH010004262026

Filing Number

371/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

253/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

Kolari Police Station,Dhaulpur

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Haripal Singh

    Adv. Omveer Gurjar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) Dholpur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of judgementView PDF

    The Session Court, Dholpur, granted bail to Haripal Singh under Section 483 CrPC in FIR No. 54/2026 for possession of an illegal .315 bore rifle without license or permission under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. The court found that while the charge is serious, the investigation is still ongoing and the offense does not warrant life imprisonment or capital punishment, making bail appropriate at this stage. The accused was ordered to furnish two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000 to be released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Session Court, Dholpur, granted bail to Haripal Singh under Section 483 CrPC in FIR No. 54/2026 for possession of an illegal .315 bore rifle without license or permission under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. The court found that while the charge is serious, the investigation is still ongoing and the offense does not warrant life imprisonment or capital punishment, making bail appropriate at this stage. The accused was ordered to furnish two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000 to be released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case