Bhupendra Singh Shakya urf Tinku vs State Government Advocate - PP Dholpur — 247/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 09th March 2026.
Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC
CNR: RJDH010004152026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
360/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
247/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
FIR Details
FIR Number
103
Police Station
Mahila Police Station,Dhaulpur
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhupendra Singh Shakya urf Tinku
Adv. Gopal SinghGurjar
Respondent(s)
State Government Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) Dholpur
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings | |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Dholpur, Rajasthan granted bail to the accused Bhupendra Singh Shakya under Section 483 BNS, rejecting the prosecution's opposition. The court found that charges under IPC Sections 363, 420, 406, and 120B and the POCSO Act were alleged but considered the accused innocent given the lack of recovery and absence of prior criminal record, ultimately granting him the benefit of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Dholpur, Rajasthan granted bail to the accused Bhupendra Singh Shakya under Section 483 BNS, rejecting the prosecution's opposition. The court found that charges under IPC Sections 363, 420, 406, and 120B and the POCSO Act were alleged but considered the accused innocent given the lack of recovery and absence of prior criminal record, ultimately granting him the benefit of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts