Lalit pal vs JVVNL Advocate - PP Dholpur — 2/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section appeal. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 09th March 2026.
Civil Misc. Appeal - CIVIL MISC APPEAL
CNR: RJDH010002612026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
46/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lalit pal
Adv. JAI PRAKASH TYAGI
Respondent(s)
JVVNL Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) Dholpur
JVVNL through AEn
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
Compliance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 27-02-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District and Session Judge of Dholpur (Rajasthan) partially allowed the appeal of Lalit Pal against Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), directing that the appellant's electricity connection be reconnected upon depositing 50% of the disputed amount of ₹33,487 that was allegedly charged for alleged electricity theft. The court set aside the lower court's order rejecting the interim relief petition, holding that disconnecting the electricity supply without proper adjudication violated the appellant's rights and public welfare principles, though the court upheld the validity of the voltage violation report (VCR) issued against the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional District and Session Judge of Dholpur (Rajasthan) partially allowed the appeal of Lalit Pal against Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), directing that the appellant's electricity connection be reconnected upon depositing 50% of the disputed amount of ₹33,487 that was allegedly charged for alleged electricity theft. The court set aside the lower court's order rejecting the interim relief petition, holding that disconnecting the electricity supply without proper adjudication violated the appellant's rights and public welfare principles, though the court upheld the validity of the voltage violation report (VCR) issued against the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts