Lalit pal vs JVVNL Advocate - PP Dholpur — 2/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section appeal. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 09th March 2026.

Civil Misc. Appeal - CIVIL MISC APPEAL

CNR: RJDH010002612026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

46/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ

Judge

2-Addl District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section appeal

Petitioner(s)

Lalit pal

Adv. JAI PRAKASH TYAGI

Respondent(s)

JVVNL Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor) Dholpur

JVVNL through AEn

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge

09-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Orders

27-02-2026

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Judgement

Summary The Additional District and Session Judge of Dholpur (Rajasthan) partially allowed the appeal of Lalit Pal against Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), directing that the appellant's electricity connection be reconnected upon depositing 50% of the disputed amount of ₹33,487 that was allegedly charged for alleged electricity theft. The court set aside the lower court's order rejecting the interim relief petition, holding that disconnecting the electricity supply without proper adjudication violated the appellant's rights and public welfare principles, though the court upheld the validity of the voltage violation report (VCR) issued against the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District and Session Judge of Dholpur (Rajasthan) partially allowed the appeal of Lalit Pal against Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), directing that the appellant's electricity connection be reconnected upon depositing 50% of the disputed amount of ₹33,487 that was allegedly charged for alleged electricity theft. The court set aside the lower court's order rejecting the interim relief petition, holding that disconnecting the electricity supply without proper adjudication violated the appellant's rights and public welfare principles, though the court upheld the validity of the voltage violation report (VCR) issued against the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Dholpur District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case