State vs manilal Advocate - Sh. Virendra Sing Chouhan — 509/2023
Case under Arms Act Section 4,25. Disposed: Uncontested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 11th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJDG090007952023
Filing Number
795/2023
Filing Date
17-Aug-2023
Registration No
509/2023
Registration Date
17-Aug-2023
Court
Criminal Cases Simalwara Establishment
Judge
1-Jm
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Convicted and Released on Probation
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
Police Station Kunwa
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. Apo
Respondent(s)
-
1.manilal Advocate - Sh. Virendra Sing Chouhan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court found the accused guilty under Section 4/25 of the Ayush Adhiniyam and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹20,000 with an additional fine of ₹500, ordering the accused to deposit the amount by 11.03.2026. The court rejected the accused's defense arguments and upheld the prosecution's case, directing that the final warrant of conviction be issued and appropriate action be taken accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
30-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
29-Jan-2026
Appearance of accused
Jm
-
22-Dec-2025
Appearance of accused
Jm
-
07-Oct-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
11-Jul-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
09-Apr-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
07-Feb-2025
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
08-Nov-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
12-Jul-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
16-Apr-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
19-Feb-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
16-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 509/2023
The court found the accused guilty under Section 4/25 of the Ayush Adhiniyam and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹20,000 with an additional fine of ₹500, ordering the accused to deposit the amount by 11.03.2026. The court rejected the accused's defense arguments and upheld the prosecution's case, directing that the final warrant of conviction be issued and appropriate action be taken accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts