State vs Govind @ Niko Kharadi Advocate - Sh. Sravan Raval — 407/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,354. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDG090006472019

Filing Number

647/2019

Filing Date

01-Nov-2019

Registration No

407/2019

Registration Date

01-Nov-2019

Court

Criminal Cases Simalwara Establishment

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

Police Station Dhambola

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,354

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Govind @ Niko Kharadi Advocate - Sh. Sravan Raval

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court set aside the permanent warrant issued against the accused (Govind Urf Niko) and directed his immediate release, finding that the accused was not present during the court proceedings and that the warrant was issued without proper jurisdiction. The court held that the accused's bail plea was maintainable and that he cannot be detained without following proper legal procedures under Section 446 and 82-83 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  5. 15-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  6. 25-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 12-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 23-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 27-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 24-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 20-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 22-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 23-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 02-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 04-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 16-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 07-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 21-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 05-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 03-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 01-Dec-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  22. 13-Oct-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  23. 07-Sep-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  24. 12-Aug-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  25. 10-Aug-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  26. 17-Jun-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  27. 10-May-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  28. 19-Feb-2022

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  29. 24-Nov-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  30. 29-Sep-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  31. 25-Aug-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  32. 29-Jun-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  33. 18-May-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  34. 17-Mar-2021

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  35. 18-Dec-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  36. 16-Sep-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  37. 09-Jul-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  38. 12-Jun-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  39. 16-May-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  40. 02-May-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  41. 18-Apr-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  42. 31-Mar-2020

    Hearing arguments on Charge

    Jm

  43. 18-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 01-Nov-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 407/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The court set aside the permanent warrant issued against the accused (Govind Urf Niko) and directed his immediate release, finding that the accused was not present during the court proceedings and that the warrant was issued without proper jurisdiction. The court held that the accused's bail plea was maintainable and that he cannot be detained without following proper legal procedures under Section 446 and 82-83 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case