State vs Nainesh urf Papu urf chaina urf sarkit etc. Advocate - Shr.Virendra Singh Chouhan — 482/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,34. Status: Prosecution Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJDG090006302017
Filing Number
630/2017
Filing Date
06-Nov-2017
Registration No
482/2017
Registration Date
06-Nov-2017
Court
Criminal Cases Simalwara Establishment
Judge
1-Jm
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
134
Police Station
Police Station Dhambola
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. App.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nainesh urf Papu urf chaina urf sarkit etc. Advocate - Shr.Virendra Singh Chouhan
-
2.Dhiraj Parmar
Adv. Sh. Virendra Sing Chouhan
-
3.Prahalad Kharadi
Adv. Sh. Virendra Sing Chouhan
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-May-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
09-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
11-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
30-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
15-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
26-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
30-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
17-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
19-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
10-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
24-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
07-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
03-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
06-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
06-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
08-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
12-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
09-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
02-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
17-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
06-Aug-2024
Appearance of accused
Jm
-
04-Jun-2024
Appearance of accused
Jm
-
08-May-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
15-Mar-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
07-Feb-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
24-Nov-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
26-Sep-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
13-Jul-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
31-May-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
Jm
-
26-May-2023
Restored
Jm
-
09-Apr-2019
judgementView PDF
CASE OUTCOME SUMMARY The accused Naresh was acquitted and discharged of charges under IPC Section 392 (dacoity) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's identification of the accused was weak and the recovered motorcycle belonged to a co-accused. The accused's bail was cancelled and the investigation against the other co-accused under Section 173(8) CrPC remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Nov-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 482/2017
CASE OUTCOME SUMMARY The accused Naresh was acquitted and discharged of charges under IPC Section 392 (dacoity) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's identification of the accused was weak and the recovered motorcycle belonged to a co-accused. The accused's bail was cancelled and the investigation against the other co-accused under Section 173(8) CrPC remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts