Hitesh tabiyad vs State Advocate - APO — 150/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed otherwise on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJDG090003312026

Filing Number

331/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

150/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Criminal Cases Simalwara Establishment

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed otherwise

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Police Station Dhambola

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hitesh tabiyad

    Adv. Sh.Goutam Lal Roat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - APO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court ordered the petitioner to deposit ₹1,50,000 as security within the prescribed period to obtain release of their vehicle (Motor Cycle No. 12 NP 2272) that was seized under Sections 497/503 CrPC. The court directed that upon submission of the security amount and execution of an indemnity bond, the vehicle must be released, as prolonged detention of seized vehicles at police stations serves no purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court ordered the petitioner to deposit ₹1,50,000 as security within the prescribed period to obtain release of their vehicle (Motor Cycle No. 12 NP 2272) that was seized under Sections 497/503 CrPC. The court directed that upon submission of the security amount and execution of an indemnity bond, the vehicle must be released, as prolonged detention of seized vehicles at police stations serves no purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case