Dinesh nanoma vs State Advocate - APO — 148/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed otherwise on 11th March 2026.
Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC
CNR: RJDG090003292026
Filing Number
329/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
148/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Criminal Cases Simalwara Establishment
Judge
1-Jm
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed otherwise
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dinesh nanoma
Adv. Sh. Kapil Dev Roat
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Advocate - APO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court ordered the release of a seized vehicle (Auto Aarzje 12 PF 5620) to the petitioner upon furnishing a bond of ₹3,00,000, holding that prolonged detention of seized vehicles at police stations serves no purpose. The court directed that the vehicle not be sold or transferred to any other person, and that it be produced before the court if required, citing the principle that magistrates must pass appropriate orders for vehicle release with proper bonds and security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 148/2026
The court ordered the release of a seized vehicle (Auto Aarzje 12 PF 5620) to the petitioner upon furnishing a bond of ₹3,00,000, holding that prolonged detention of seized vehicles at police stations serves no purpose. The court directed that the vehicle not be sold or transferred to any other person, and that it be produced before the court if required, citing the principle that magistrates must pass appropriate orders for vehicle release with proper bonds and security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts