Harish damor vs State Advocate - APO — 143/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed otherwise on 11th March 2026.
Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC
CNR: RJDG090003242026
Filing Number
324/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
143/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Criminal Cases Simalwara Establishment
Judge
1-Jm
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed otherwise
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Police Station Dhambola
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Harish damor
Adv. Sh.Goutam Lal Roat
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Advocate - APO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed a petition challenging the seizure of a vehicle (Motorsaekikal No. 12 Jeeps 8637) by Chaurasi Police Station, Sujanpur, Jaunpur District, finding that the police had lawful authority under Section 497/503 CrPC to seize the vehicle and that proper procedures were followed. The court imposed a security deposit of ₹1,20,000 as a condition for the vehicle's return and rejected the petitioner's arguments that the seizure was unlawful or that the vehicle belonged to an innocent third party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 143/2026
The court dismissed a petition challenging the seizure of a vehicle (Motorsaekikal No. 12 Jeeps 8637) by Chaurasi Police Station, Sujanpur, Jaunpur District, finding that the police had lawful authority under Section 497/503 CrPC to seize the vehicle and that proper procedures were followed. The court imposed a security deposit of ₹1,20,000 as a condition for the vehicle's return and rejected the petitioner's arguments that the seizure was unlawful or that the vehicle belonged to an innocent third party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts