State vs Dipak Bhejawani Advocate - Sh. Virendra Sing Chouhan — 159/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185,207. Disposed: Uncontested--Convicted on Plead Guilty / Plea Bargaining on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDG090003102026

Filing Number

310/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

159/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Criminal Cases Simalwara Establishment

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Convicted on Plead Guilty / Plea Bargaining

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Police Station Chaurasi

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185,207

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dipak Bhejawani Advocate - Sh. Virendra Sing Chouhan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the accused's petition challenging Section 185 (drunk driving offense) proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act, holding that the accused's claim of defective breathalyzer equipment lacked merit as no credible evidence was provided and the procedural requirements were properly followed. The court convicted the accused and imposed a fine of Rs. 2,500 with directions to complete the penalty payment and undergo the mandated rehabilitation program within the specified timeline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the accused's petition challenging Section 185 (drunk driving offense) proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act, holding that the accused's claim of defective breathalyzer equipment lacked merit as no credible evidence was provided and the procedural requirements were properly followed. The court convicted the accused and imposed a fine of Rs. 2,500 with directions to complete the penalty payment and undergo the mandated rehabilitation program within the specified timeline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case