State vs Vijaypal Urf Vikram Advocate - SH. MOHAMMAD JAHID — 1573/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJDG020023122018
Filing Number
2311/2018
Filing Date
12-Oct-2018
Registration No
1573/2018
Registration Date
12-Oct-2018
Court
CJM ACJM JM AMJM Dungarpur District HQ
Judge
5-Jm
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
136
Police Station
Police Station Dowda
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. KAVISH JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vijaypal Urf Vikram Advocate - SH. MOHAMMAD JAHID
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
The court acquitted the accused Vijaypal Urf Vikram of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the vehicle (JJZ-07-R-7695) that hit the victim's wife on August 3, 2018. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the vehicle's identity and the driver's identity, which created reasonable doubt about the accused's involvement in the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jm
-
11-Mar-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Jm
-
18-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Jm
-
10-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Jm
-
28-Jan-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Jm
-
20-Jan-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Jm
-
09-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
03-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
17-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
28-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
21-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
08-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
20-May-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
28-Feb-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
10-Nov-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
11-Aug-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
23-Apr-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
21-Jan-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
31-Oct-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
04-Aug-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
12-May-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
14-Oct-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
06-Jul-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
03-Apr-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
13-Feb-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
17-Dec-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Oct-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 1573/2018
The court acquitted the accused Vijaypal Urf Vikram of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the vehicle (JJZ-07-R-7695) that hit the victim's wife on August 3, 2018. The court noted significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the vehicle's identity and the driver's identity, which created reasonable doubt about the accused's involvement in the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts