State vs HARSH NARAYAN Advocate - SH. KAMLESH KUMAR PANDA — 901/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJDG020012832018

Filing Number

1282/2018

Filing Date

31-May-2018

Registration No

901/2018

Registration Date

31-May-2018

Court

CJM ACJM JM AMJM Dungarpur District HQ

Judge

3-CJM

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

94

Police Station

Sadar Dungarpur

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. KAVISH JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARSH NARAYAN Advocate - SH. KAMLESH KUMAR PANDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The court acquitted accused Harshnnarayan of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 134/187 due to insufficient evidence. While the complainant alleged a Scorpio vehicle hit his brother on April 22, 2018, the court found critical gaps: the vehicle and driver's identity could not be definitively established, eyewitnesses gave conflicting accounts, and some witnesses were declared hostile. The court ruled reasonable doubt existed and applied benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    Appearance of accused

    CJM

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 24-Sep-2025

    Final arguments

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 17-Sep-2025

    Final arguments

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 28-Jul-2025

    Final arguments

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 06-Jun-2025

    Final arguments

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 03-May-2025

    Final arguments

  17. 05-Mar-2025

    Final arguments

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 01-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 10-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Addl. Civil Judge cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 09-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 18-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 28-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 08-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 26-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 14-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 19-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 03-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 03-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 15-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 02-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 05-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 08-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 05-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 18-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  35. 12-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 06-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  37. 10-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  38. 04-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  39. 17-Jan-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  40. 31-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  41. 22-Sep-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  42. 16-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  43. 05-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  44. 28-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  45. 16-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  46. 15-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  47. 16-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  48. 11-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  49. 27-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  50. 18-Aug-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  51. 21-May-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  52. 21-Dec-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  53. 03-Aug-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  54. 16-May-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  55. 12-Mar-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  56. 20-Dec-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  57. 31-Oct-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  58. 11-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  59. 24-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 31-May-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 901/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted accused Harshnnarayan of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 134/187 due to insufficient evidence. While the complainant alleged a Scorpio vehicle hit his brother on April 22, 2018, the court found critical gaps: the vehicle and driver's identity could not be definitively established, eyewitnesses gave conflicting accounts, and some witnesses were declared hostile. The court ruled reasonable doubt existed and applied benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case