SANESHWAR @ SANA vs State Advocate - SH. KAUSHIK PANDYA (P.P.) — 30/2022
Case under Cr.p.c Section 33. Disposed: Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed on 16th April 2026.
Cr. Appeal
CNR: RJDG010005092022
Filing Number
405/2022
Filing Date
10-05-2022
Registration No
30/2022
Registration Date
10-05-2022
Court
DJ ADJ Dungarpur District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
Police Station Nithauwa
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANESHWAR @ SANA
Adv. SH. CHANDRA SINGH CHUNDAWAT
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - SH. KAUSHIK PANDYA (P.P.)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgment
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 30-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Saneshwar @ Sana v. State of Rajasthan (Criminal Appeal No. 30/2022, dated 16.04.2026) The Session Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld his conviction under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A. The court found that the appellant recklessly operated a jeep (overloaded with passengers) at high speed on a downward slope, causing it to overturn and resulting in one death and multiple injuries. Evidence from eyewitnesses, mechanical inspection confirming no vehicle defect, and scene documentation proved the accident stemmed from the driver's negligence and rash driving, not external factors as the appellant claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Saneshwar @ Sana v. State of Rajasthan (Criminal Appeal No. 30/2022, dated 16.04.2026) The Session Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld his conviction under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A. The court found that the appellant recklessly operated a jeep (overloaded with passengers) at high speed on a downward slope, causing it to overturn and resulting in one death and multiple injuries. Evidence from eyewitnesses, mechanical inspection confirming no vehicle defect, and scene documentation proved the accident stemmed from the driver's negligence and rash driving, not external factors as the appellant claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts