SANESHWAR @ SANA vs State Advocate - SH. KAUSHIK PANDYA (P.P.) — 30/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 33. Disposed: Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJDG010005092022

Filing Number

405/2022

Filing Date

10-May-2022

Registration No

30/2022

Registration Date

10-May-2022

Court

DJ ADJ Dungarpur District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Dismissed

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

75

Police Station

Police Station Nithauwa

Year

2012

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 33
Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANESHWAR @ SANA

    Adv. SH. CHANDRA SINGH CHUNDAWAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - SH. KAUSHIK PANDYA (P.P.)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Saneshwar @ Sana v. State of Rajasthan (Criminal Appeal No. 30/2022, dated 16.04.2026) The Session Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld his conviction under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A. The court found that the appellant recklessly operated a jeep (overloaded with passengers) at high speed on a downward slope, causing it to overturn and resulting in one death and multiple injuries. Evidence from eyewitnesses, mechanical inspection confirming no vehicle defect, and scene documentation proved the accident stemmed from the driver's negligence and rash driving, not external factors as the appellant claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 14-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 17-Dec-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 01-Nov-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 06-Aug-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 28-May-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 07-Feb-2025

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 30-Nov-2024

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 04-Sep-2024

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 18-Jul-2024

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 17-May-2024

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 17-Feb-2024

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 21-Nov-2023

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 06-Sep-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  22. 17-Jun-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  23. 01-Apr-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  24. 04-Feb-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  25. 06-Dec-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  26. 22-Sep-2022

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  27. 12-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 10-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Saneshwar @ Sana v. State of Rajasthan (Criminal Appeal No. 30/2022, dated 16.04.2026) The Session Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld his conviction under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A. The court found that the appellant recklessly operated a jeep (overloaded with passengers) at high speed on a downward slope, causing it to overturn and resulting in one death and multiple injuries. Evidence from eyewitnesses, mechanical inspection confirming no vehicle defect, and scene documentation proved the accident stemmed from the driver's negligence and rash driving, not external factors as the appellant claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case