State vs SHANTILAL Advocate - SH. SHAHID JAMAN KHAN — 35/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,452. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 11th March 2026.

Session Case

CNR: RJDG010003852022

Case disposed

Filing Number

309/2022

Filing Date

05-04-2022

Registration No

35/2022

Registration Date

21-04-2022

Court

DJ ADJ Dungarpur District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

95

Police Station

Sadar Dungarpur

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 376,452

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. SH. KAUSHIK PANDYA (P.P.)

Respondent(s)

SHANTILAL Advocate - SH. SHAHID JAMAN KHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

27-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

19-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

10-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Session Court in Dungarpur, Rajasthan acquitted the accused Shantilal of charges under IPC Sections 450 (criminal intimidation) and 376 (rape) on March 11, 2026. The court found the prosecution's case rife with contradictions: the victim named the accused based on suspicion rather than certainty, delayed filing her complaint by 16 months without explanation, and provided inconsistent statements across her written report, magistrate examination, and cross-examination. The court also noted the victim failed to immediately inform her husband about the 2019 alleged rape and that both the victim and her husband later filed counter-cases against the accused, suggesting motivated accusations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Session Court in Dungarpur, Rajasthan acquitted the accused Shantilal of charges under IPC Sections 450 (criminal intimidation) and 376 (rape) on March 11, 2026. The court found the prosecution's case rife with contradictions: the victim named the accused based on suspicion rather than certainty, delayed filing her complaint by 16 months without explanation, and provided inconsistent statements across her written report, magistrate examination, and cross-examination. The court also noted the victim failed to immediately inform her husband about the 2019 alleged rape and that both the victim and her husband later filed counter-cases against the accused, suggesting motivated accusations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Dungarpur District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case