ANITA URF INDU vs State Advocate - SH. PUSHKER CHOUBISA PP — 103/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 11th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJDG010002052026
Filing Number
189/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
103/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Dungarpur District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
52
Police Station
Police Station Dhambola
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANITA URF INDU
Adv. SH. SHIV SHANKAR KATARA
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - SH. PUSHKER CHOUBISA PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Court Decision: The Session Court of Dungarpur granted bail to Smt. Anita under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure on March 11, 2026. The applicant was accused of wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt to a woman on March 14, 2025, but her absence from a scheduled hearing was attributed to lack of notification about case transfer rather than willful non-cooperation. The court accepted her bail application on condition of furnishing a bond of ₹25,000 and personal surety of equivalent amount, with the requirement that she appear regularly in court and not obstruct proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court Decision: The Session Court of Dungarpur granted bail to Smt. Anita under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure on March 11, 2026. The applicant was accused of wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt to a woman on March 14, 2025, but her absence from a scheduled hearing was attributed to lack of notification about case transfer rather than willful non-cooperation. The court accepted her bail application on condition of furnishing a bond of ₹25,000 and personal surety of equivalent amount, with the requirement that she appear regularly in court and not obstruct proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts