ANITA URF INDU vs State Advocate - SH. PUSHKER CHOUBISA PP — 103/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJDG010002052026

Filing Number

189/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Dungarpur District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

52

Police Station

Police Station Dhambola

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANITA URF INDU

    Adv. SH. SHIV SHANKAR KATARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - SH. PUSHKER CHOUBISA PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Court Decision: The Session Court of Dungarpur granted bail to Smt. Anita under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure on March 11, 2026. The applicant was accused of wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt to a woman on March 14, 2025, but her absence from a scheduled hearing was attributed to lack of notification about case transfer rather than willful non-cooperation. The court accepted her bail application on condition of furnishing a bond of ₹25,000 and personal surety of equivalent amount, with the requirement that she appear regularly in court and not obstruct proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Session Court of Dungarpur granted bail to Smt. Anita under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure on March 11, 2026. The applicant was accused of wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt to a woman on March 14, 2025, but her absence from a scheduled hearing was attributed to lack of notification about case transfer rather than willful non-cooperation. The court accepted her bail application on condition of furnishing a bond of ₹25,000 and personal surety of equivalent amount, with the requirement that she appear regularly in court and not obstruct proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case